Core™ i9-13980HX
24 cores / 32 threads, up to 5.60 GHz
GeeCool24 cores / 32 threads, up to 5.60 GHz
24 cores / 24 threads, up to 5.50 GHz, AI acceleration
Recommended Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285HX
This one is tight: 84 vs 82, roughly 1% apart. Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285HX edges it, but your workload should break the tie. If AI Capability is your main lane, Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285HX’s ~11% index lead is the actionable signal. If Gaming Index outranks everything, Core™ i9-13980HX is the honest pick. Platform planning: match cooling and board tier to up to 5.5 GHz, 24 / 24, 36 MB L3 cache. The largest practical gaps show up in on AI Capability: +11%, about +5% in Value Index—if that is your week, Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285HX pays off. The final word is your most-used software, not this page.
Generated by GeeCool AI
The higher Gaming Index usually means smoother frame pacing and better minimums in CPU-sensitive games.
If Premiere, Blender, or OBS is daily work, Content Creation Index is more actionable than raw cores.
When you need sustained throughput, Compute Index is more informative than peak clock alone.
The higher AI Capability tends to have more headroom for local LLMs and Stable Diffusion-style workloads.
Efficiency is not just TDP—Efficiency Index captures the performance-per-watt balance.
The higher Value Index often delivers a better return on platform spend.
Left/right order follows slug order in the URL