Guest
CPU Comparison
intel

Core™ i9-12900TE

G-Score 72 Overall Score

16 cores / 24 threads, up to 4.80 GHz

intel

Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

G-Score 68 Overall Score

16 cores / 16 threads, up to 4.90 GHz, AI acceleration

Insight

VERDICT

Recommended Core™ i9-12900TE

Reality check: only about 5% separates them—Core™ i9-12900TE is a soft default, not a mandate. That said, Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H still has a case in Efficiency Index, Value Index—if those matter more, do not let total score override your priorities. Spec sheet: up to 4.8 GHz, 30 MB L3 cache, 16 / 24—Core™ i9-12900TE is built for sustained load, not just burst. If Compute Index is your main lane, Core™ i9-12900TE’s ~16% index lead is the actionable signal. SFF builders: treat ~28% efficiency as a real constraint. Bottom line: treat “Recommended” as sort order—your main app index is still the judge.

Generated by GeeCool AI

Signals

Head-to-Head Specs

16 / 24
Cores
16 / 16
4.8 GHz
Clock
4.9 GHz
30 MB
Cache
18 MB
GeeCool Index

Six Index Comparison

Gaming Index

Game performance
Better in this index Intel® Core™ i9-12900TE Processor
84
80
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

For gaming-first builds, Gaming Index is a better guide than core count alone.

Content Creation Index

Editing, rendering & streaming
Better in this index Intel® Core™ i9-12900TE Processor
78
69
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

A higher Content Creation Index generally helps with editing, rendering, streaming, and design workflows.

Compute Index

Compilation & multithreaded workloads
Better in this index Intel® Core™ i9-12900TE Processor
73
63
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

The higher Compute Index usually wins on compile jobs, VMs, and sustained compute workloads.

AI Capability

On-device AI workloads
Better in this index Intel® Core™ i9-12900TE Processor
73
67
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

AI Capability combines ISA support, acceleration, and memory factors for on-device AI.

Efficiency Index

Performance per watt
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
67
86
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

The higher Efficiency Index usually means less power and heat for similar performance.

Value Index

Capability vs platform cost
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
27
28
Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H

On a budget, Value Index helps you spend on capability rather than badge value.

Specs

Key Differences

Spec Core™ i9-12900TE Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
硬件类型 CPU CPU
核心 / 线程 16 / 24 16 / 16
最高 Boost 4.8 GHz 4.9 GHz
L3 缓存 30 MB 18 MB
平台 FCLGA1700 FCBGA2540
内存支持 Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5X 9600MT/s Up to DDR5 7200 MT/s
Guide

Buying Choice

Why choose Core™ i9-12900TE?

  • 30.00 MB L3 cache — smoother gaming with fewer hitches
  • 16 cores / 24 threads — higher multithreaded throughput

Why choose Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H?

  • Efficiency-focused specs for quiet, cool builds
  • Balanced specs with stronger platform value

Left/right order follows slug order in the URL