Guest
CPU Comparison
intel

Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H

G-Score 77 Overall Score

16 cores / 16 threads, up to 5.40 GHz, AI acceleration

intel

Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

G-Score 67 Overall Score

16 cores / 16 threads, up to 4.80 GHz, AI acceleration

Insight

VERDICT

Recommended Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H

For one-and-done builds, Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H is the intended pick. 24 MB L3 cache, 16 / 16, up to 5.4 GHz explains why heavy loads stay smooth on Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H. Heavy AI Capability users should weight about +23% in AI Capability, Gaming Index (+16%) heavily. Scenario-first: AI Capability favors Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H (~+23%). Bottom line: treat “Recommended” as sort order—your main app index is still the judge.

Generated by GeeCool AI

Signals

Head-to-Head Specs

16 / 16
Cores
16 / 16
5.4 GHz
Clock
4.8 GHz
24 MB
Cache
18 MB
GeeCool Index

Six Index Comparison

Gaming Index

Game performance
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
91
78
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

The higher Gaming Index usually means smoother frame pacing and better minimums in CPU-sensitive games.

Content Creation Index

Editing, rendering & streaming
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
75
66
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

If Premiere, Blender, or OBS is daily work, Content Creation Index is more actionable than raw cores.

Compute Index

Compilation & multithreaded workloads
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
72
63
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

When you need sustained throughput, Compute Index is more informative than peak clock alone.

AI Capability

On-device AI workloads
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
81
66
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

The higher AI Capability tends to have more headroom for local LLMs and Stable Diffusion-style workloads.

Efficiency Index

Performance per watt
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
90
85
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

Efficiency is not just TDP—Efficiency Index captures the performance-per-watt balance.

Value Index

Capability vs platform cost
Better in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H
30
28
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H

The higher Value Index often delivers a better return on platform spend.

Specs

Key Differences

Spec Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H
硬件类型 CPU CPU
核心 / 线程 16 / 16 16 / 16
最高 Boost 5.4 GHz 4.8 GHz
L3 缓存 24 MB 18 MB
平台 FCBGA2049 FCBGA2540
内存支持 Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/sUp to DDR5 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR5X 9600 MT/s
Guide

Buying Choice

Why choose Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 285H?

  • 24.00 MB L3 cache — smoother gaming with fewer hitches
  • Up to 5.40 GHz boost — stronger single-core bursts
  • Core count suits compilation, VMs, and heavy compute

Why choose Core™ Ultra X7 Processor 358H?

  • Each CPU has different strengths — check specs and scenarios below

Left/right order follows slug order in the URL