Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
G-Score 75 Overall Score
16 cores / 16 threads, up to 5.10 GHz, AI acceleration
GeeCoolGuest
GeeCoolCPU Comparison
Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
G-Score 68 Overall Score
16 cores / 16 threads, up to 4.90 GHz, AI acceleration
VERDICT
Recommended Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
Clear margin: Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H leads ~9% and 6 of 6 indexes. Scenario-first: AI Capability favors Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H (~+20%). Match your week against on AI Capability: +20%, Compute Index (+12%)—that is the practical test. Match your cooling and board budget to up to 5.1 GHz, 24 MB L3 cache, 16 / 16. Happy building—may this save you one wrong click in the cart.
Generated by GeeCool AI
Head-to-Head Specs
16 / 16
Cores
16 / 16
5.1 GHz
Clock
4.9 GHz
24 MB
Cache
18 MB
Six Index Comparison
Gaming Index
Game performanceBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
86
80
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
The higher Gaming Index usually means smoother frame pacing and better minimums in CPU-sensitive games.
Content Creation Index
Editing, rendering & streamingBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
74
69
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
If Premiere, Blender, or OBS is daily work, Content Creation Index is more actionable than raw cores.
Compute Index
Compilation & multithreaded workloadsBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
71
63
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
When you need sustained throughput, Compute Index is more informative than peak clock alone.
AI Capability
On-device AI workloadsBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
81
67
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
The higher AI Capability tends to have more headroom for local LLMs and Stable Diffusion-style workloads.
Efficiency Index
Performance per wattBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
88
86
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
Efficiency is not just TDP—Efficiency Index captures the performance-per-watt balance.
Value Index
Capability vs platform costBetter in this index Intel® Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H
29
28
Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
The higher Value Index often delivers a better return on platform spend.
Key Differences
Spec Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H
硬件类型 CPU CPU
核心 / 线程 16 / 16 16 / 16
最高 Boost 5.1 GHz 4.9 GHz
L3 缓存 24 MB 18 MB
平台 FCBGA2049 FCBGA2540
内存支持 Up to LPDDR5/X 8400 MT/sUp to DDR5 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR5X 9600MT/s Up to DDR5 7200 MT/s
Buying Choice
Why choose Core™ Ultra 7 Processor 255H?
- 24.00 MB L3 cache — smoother gaming with fewer hitches
- Up to 5.10 GHz boost — stronger single-core bursts
- Core count suits compilation, VMs, and heavy compute
Why choose Core™ Ultra 9 Processor 386H?
- Each CPU has different strengths — check specs and scenarios below
Left/right order follows slug order in the URL