[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home:siteConfig":3,"decision-compare:related-list:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8581v":17,"decision-compare:brand":91,"decision-compare:faq-hot:zh":110,"decision-compare:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8581v":207,"decision-compare:faq:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8581v":388},{"code":4,"data":5,"msg":16},1000,{"s_title":6,"s_slogan":7,"s_description":8,"s_keywords":9,"s_logo_url":10,"s_favicon_url":11,"s_og_image_url":12,"s_site_url":13,"s_og_title":6,"s_og_description":8,"s_icp":14,"s_gongan_icp":9,"s_copyright":15},"极库","极客装机，酷无止境","极库（GeeCool）是 DIY 硬件社区，分享装机作品、发现装机灵感，探索 CPU、显卡、内存等硬件信息，与极客玩家一起交流。","","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Flogo\u002F852e2056-6a54-4c8c-ab3a-b423075227df.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Ffavicon\u002F8a8d0f4e-a624-4a59-a38f-502c1e017480.ico","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Fog\u002F28d69746-a0ef-4aa0-825f-38d9562c3a57.png","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.geecool.net","蜀ICP备2024109955号-2","© 2026 GeeCool. All rights reserved.","成功",[18,22,26,32,35,39,43,47,51,55,58,62,66,68,71,75,77,81,85,89],{"slug_a":19,"slug_b":20,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":21},"core-i7-13645hx","core-i7-13700hx",131,{"slug_a":23,"slug_b":24,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":25},"ryzen-threadripper-pro-3955wx","xeon-platinum-9282",81,{"slug_a":27,"slug_b":28,"name_a":29,"name_b":30,"i_heat":31},"core-i5-12490f","core-i5-13600kf","Intel® Core™ i5-12490F Processor","Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor",77,{"slug_a":33,"slug_b":34,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":31},"core-ultra-9-275hx","core-ultra-9-290hx-plus",{"slug_a":36,"slug_b":37,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":38},"core-i7-14650hx","core-ultra-7-251hx",75,{"slug_a":40,"slug_b":41,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":42},"core-i5-1340pe","core-i5-13600h",73,{"slug_a":44,"slug_b":45,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":46},"core-i5-13600t","core-ultra-5-245hx",65,{"slug_a":48,"slug_b":49,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":50},"core-ultra-7-255h","core-ultra-7-356h",57,{"slug_a":52,"slug_b":53,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":54},"ryzen-9-8945hx","ryzen-9-9955hx",56,{"slug_a":37,"slug_b":56,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":57},"core-ultra-7-255hx",54,{"slug_a":59,"slug_b":60,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":61},"core-m-5y71","ryzen-ai-5-340",50,{"slug_a":63,"slug_b":64,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":65},"core-i5-14400f","core-i5-14490f",48,{"slug_a":56,"slug_b":49,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":67},47,{"slug_a":69,"slug_b":70,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":67},"core-i3-1215ue","core-i3-12300he",{"slug_a":72,"slug_b":73,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":74},"core-i5-14600kf","core-ultra-5-250k-plus",46,{"slug_a":76,"slug_b":34,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":74},"core-i9-13900hx",{"slug_a":78,"slug_b":79,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":80},"core-ultra-5-225h","core-ultra-5-235h",45,{"slug_a":82,"slug_b":83,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":84},"core-ultra-7-265k","core-ultra-7-270k-plus",43,{"slug_a":86,"slug_b":87,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":88},"core-i9-10980xe-extreme-edition","ryzen-9-pro-9965",42,{"slug_a":90,"slug_b":63,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":88},"core-i5-13490f",{"code":4,"data":92,"msg":16},[93,100,105],{"id":94,"sort":95,"s_name":96,"s_identifier":97,"s_icon_url":98,"s_wide_image_url":99},1,0,"Intel","INTEL","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F7a8f0d43-aa34-4ae6-b527-5e4dd4406b3a.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F5fa18192-e149-4a29-b005-d8fb84fb6d6c.png",{"id":101,"sort":95,"s_name":102,"s_identifier":103,"s_icon_url":104,"s_wide_image_url":9},3,"Nvidia","NVIDIA","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F36e9735e-c4fd-4e81-9f8e-7be5e8b28ef1.png",{"id":106,"sort":94,"s_name":107,"s_identifier":107,"s_icon_url":108,"s_wide_image_url":109},2,"AMD","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002Fcb1f17f9-d291-4f7c-b323-799f5f66976c.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F32656cc6-804f-45ae-9d66-7953b3f40855.png",[111,117,122,128,133,137,142,146,150,156,160,165,170,175,180,184,190,194,198,203],{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":113,"answer":114,"page":115,"heat":116},"gaming","用 Core Ultra 5 325 装机打游戏，1080p、2K、4K 怎么配显卡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  8 核 8 线程打游戏完全够，瓶颈几乎永远在显卡。1080p 高刷配 RTX 5060\u002F5070 级别，2K 配 5070 Ti 或 RX 9070 XT 级别，4K 就把预算全给显卡和显存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  一句话：预算往显卡倾斜，CPU 选它不会成为短板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-325",443,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":118,"answer":119,"page":120,"heat":121},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 5 225H 是 14 核 14 线程的标压 H 系，配主流独显打游戏完全够格，帧数卡不卡看两件事：独显型号+实际 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost），以及这台机的 CPU 持续包功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  1080p 高刷或电竞游戏对 CPU 帧时间敏感，2K\u002F4K 基本由 GPU 决定。想验证瓶颈，插电开性能模式，用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟游戏：GPU 利用率接近 95% 且功耗贴近 TGP，就是显卡限制；GPU 利用率上不去（低于约 90%）而 CPU 有线程饱和，则检查 CPU 功耗墙、散热和性能模式。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225h",397,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":124,"answer":125,"page":126,"heat":127},"cores","Core Ultra 7 356H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程，H 后缀代表高性能移动平台。游戏的 1080p 高刷看单核和独显 TGP，2K\u002F4K 通常看 GPU；编译、编码、剪辑和 CPU 渲染可利用 16 条线程，但长时间性能必须核对 CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式和共享散热。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  具体机型的 10 至 15 分钟功耗\u002F频率日志比峰值睿频更能说明它是否适合长任务。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-356h",396,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":129,"answer":130,"page":131,"heat":132},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225U 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  225U 只有 2 个 P 核，单核性能可应付网游但无法支撑 3A 大作；核显较弱，1080p 低画质下 LOL、CS2 勉强流畅。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  它面向长续航办公场景，游戏不是设计重点。以游戏为主要需求，H 系列独显本更合适。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225u",391,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":134,"answer":135,"page":120,"heat":136},"Core Ultra 5 225H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  14 核 14 线程（4 性能核 + 8 能效核 + 2 低功耗核），性能核基频 1.7GHz、睿频 4.9GHz，L3 缓存 18MB，Arrow Lake 平台，2025 年 Q1 发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  225H 和 235H 同架构，只是基频低一些，日常体验几乎无差别；14 线程在游戏、开发、剪辑里都够，持续重负载受笔记本功耗墙限制。这个档位选机器看价格和模具散热就行。\u003C\u002Fp>",388,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":138,"answer":139,"page":140,"heat":141},"Core Ultra 7 255H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  16 核 16 线程，注意 Arrow Lake 移动版同样没有超线程。游戏、开发、中度剪辑按这个规模看是够的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  大型编译和长视频导出能吃满全部线程，但笔记本能不能一直保持这个性能，取决于整机功耗墙、独显 TGP 和散热，光看型号没意义。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255h",387,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":143,"answer":144,"page":140,"heat":145},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  255H 游戏本先看独显 TGP 和 CPU 持续功耗，16 核 16 线程只是其次。1080p 高刷更吃 CPU 内存，2K\u002F4K 先看显卡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  买之前核对 TGP、插电后两种模式下的实际功耗、有没有独显直连。同名显卡 TGP 差一截，比处理器型号更能改变游戏结果。\u003C\u002Fp>",382,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":147,"answer":148,"page":149,"heat":145},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 24 核 24 线程的 HX 处理器。游戏性能主要看显卡和模具，255HX 不是瓶颈：两台机摆一起，一台上 4060 满功耗加独显直连，一台上 4070 但 80W 锁功耗还没直连，前者游戏体验可能更好。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  选 255HX 游戏本：显卡 TGP、MUX、性能模式功耗，三样确认完再比价。CPU 型号本身不用纠结。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255hx",{"slug":151,"type":151,"question":152,"answer":153,"page":154,"heat":155},"cooling","Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  游戏 270K Plus 用高规格双塔或 240\u002F280 水冷。解除功耗限制后持续全核编译编码渲染超 180W，就上顶级双塔或 360 水冷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  跑 15-20 分钟全核看包功耗、频率和 VRM 状态，掉得明显就降功耗或升级散热。确认 LGA1851 扣具和机箱排热。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-270k-plus",379,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":157,"answer":158,"page":149,"heat":159},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 20 核 20 线程（8 性能核 + 12 能效核，无超线程），Arrow Lake，基础 2.4GHz、最高 5.2GHz，L3 30MB。它和 265HX 是同一颗硅片的两个频率档位，规格几乎一样，265HX 只是睿频略高 0.1GHz，实际跑游戏、剪视频、编译的差距都在 3% 以内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  所以选机器时这两个型号不值得纠结，同一模具下的 255HX 和 265HX 用起来几乎没有区别。真正决定这台 HX 本性能上限的是整机的功耗释放和散热设计，同样是 20 核 20 线程，给 60W 和给 150W 是两台不同的电脑。\u003C\u002Fp>",375,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":161,"answer":162,"page":163,"heat":164},"Core i7 14650HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  16 核 24 线程的 HX 移动 U，游戏本常见配置。这规格的“够不够”关键在整机能不能一直喂饱，而不只是参数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  办公、多任务按规格判断就行；编码、渲染得看具体机型。14 代 HX 记得更新 BIOS 微码。同样的 U，厚机本比轻薄本强得多。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i7-14650hx",371,{"slug":166,"type":166,"question":167,"answer":168,"page":154,"heat":169},"motherboard","给 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  270K Plus 使用 LGA1851、800 系列芯片组与 DDR5。超频选 Z890，默认使用选供电扎实的 B860，H810 难以承载 24 核高功耗持续负载。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  核对 BIOS 与 CPU 支持表，再按显卡、M.2、USB、网卡与 VRM 散热取舍。长期编译渲染的预算优先给供电与散热，而非装饰性接口。\u003C\u002Fp>",357,{"slug":171,"type":171,"question":172,"answer":173,"page":163,"heat":174},"power","Core i7 14650HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  短时间使用的话，性能模式的意义不大，那是给持续满载任务准备的。14650HX 的额定功耗不是实际功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  开不开性能模式，看任务时长、噪声和散热余量。短任务用平衡就够，风扇也安静不少。\u003C\u002Fp>",349,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":176,"answer":177,"page":178,"heat":179},"Core i5 14400F 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  14400F 配中端独显很合适：1080p 高刷更看 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K\u002F4K 基本是显卡决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  跟便宜型号比，锁同一显卡、内存、驱动和功耗设置，再看同场景的 1% low。如果你还要边玩边直播、录制或编译，注意 CPU 会不会长期满载，多线程负载比单纯打游戏更早碰到功耗和散热天花板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14400f",348,{"slug":171,"type":171,"question":181,"answer":182,"page":149,"heat":183},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  255HX 的功耗模式实测方法照旧：性能模式全核 10 分钟，看 Package Power 和 GPU 功耗分配。这代 HX 的功耗策略整体不错，但机身散热仍是天花板。插电打游戏或渲染开性能模式，风扇噪音大点就大点；离电办公平衡模式，续航更重要。\u003C\u002Fp>",344,{"slug":185,"type":186,"question":187,"answer":188,"page":149,"heat":189},"battery","general","搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  255HX 平台轻办公约 5 小时，游戏必须插电。离电省电就三样：混合显卡、60Hz、平衡模式。后台软件和屏幕亮度对续航的影响比 CPU 型号大，对比两台机器先把这些条件对齐。想要长续航，选轻薄本，不是 HX 本。\u003C\u002Fp>",343,{"slug":185,"type":186,"question":191,"answer":192,"page":163,"heat":193},"搭载 Core i7 14650HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  续航是整机指标：电池容量、屏幕和低负载功耗决定办公续航，独显功耗和插电条件决定游戏体验。14650HX 无法单独推算出小时数。HX 机型不插电游戏基本不现实，办公续航重点看电池 Wh 和混合显卡设置。\u003C\u002Fp>",333,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":195,"answer":196,"page":154,"heat":197},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 24 核 24 线程（Arrow Lake 无超线程）的桌面处理器。1080p 高刷吃 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K 是 CPU\u002FGPU 平衡，4K 基本看显卡；24 核更适合边编译、边直播、边渲染的用法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  对比便宜型号时固定显卡、内存、驱动和 BIOS 功耗，测同场景帧时间。核心数不能替代实测，别据此报帧数。游戏场景它的性价比一般，生产力才是主场。\u003C\u002Fp>",330,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":199,"answer":200,"page":201,"heat":202},"Core i5 14600KF 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  14600KF 是 14 核 20 线程（6 性能核 + 8 能效核），无核显，是 2023 年的甜点 i5。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  游戏和轻度生产力通吃，20 线程渲染编译也够。KF 无核显必须配独显，价格比 14600K 便宜一点点。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14600kf",328,{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":204,"answer":205,"page":126,"heat":206},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 356H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程的标压处理器，CPU 性能对游戏绰绰有余，瓶颈几乎只可能在显卡或整机功耗分配。选购\u002F优化先核对三样：独显型号与 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost）、CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式是否生效。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  1080p 高刷或模拟类游戏留意 CPU 帧时间，2K\u002F4K 看 GPU；用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟：GPU 约 95% 利用率且功耗贴近 TGP 是显卡限制，GPU 低于约 90% 而 CPU 线程饱和则查 CPU 功耗墙和散热。多核是给渲染\u002F编译用的，游戏帧数别从核心数推导。\u003C\u002Fp>",326,{"cpuA":208,"cpuB":286,"winnerSlug":288,"recommendation":345,"scenarios":351,"diffRows":362,"faq":381},{"id":209,"slug":210,"name":211,"brand":212,"gee_cool_page":213,"intro":214,"features":215,"metrics":218,"highlights":236,"scores":258},"Xg96d5D3tGyjH4ibh5xZ8g","ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX","amd","\u002Fcpu\u002Famd\u002Fryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","Get drivers and downloads for the latest version of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX",[216,217],"large_cache","avx512",{"cores":219,"threads":223,"boost":226,"cache":230,"tdp":233},{"value":220,"display":221,"percent":222},32,"32 \u002F 64",100,{"value":224,"display":225,"percent":222},64,"64",{"value":227,"display":228,"percent":229},5.3,"5.3 GHz",88,{"value":231,"display":232,"percent":222},128,"128 MB",{"value":234,"display":235,"percent":95},350,"350 W",[237,241,244,247,250,254],{"key":238,"label":239,"value":240},"socket","插槽","sTR5",{"key":242,"label":243,"value":232},"cache","三级缓存",{"key":245,"label":246,"value":228},"boost","最高频率",{"key":248,"label":249,"value":235},"tdp","TDP",{"key":251,"label":252,"value":253},"memory","内存","DDR5",{"key":255,"label":256,"value":257},"launch","上市","10\u002F19\u002F2023",{"gaming_index":259,"content_creation_index":260,"compute_index":261,"ai_index":262,"efficiency_index":263,"value_index":264,"g_score":265,"breakdown":266},144.12,89.67,96.53,68.51,113.36,25.62,97.63,{"gaming":267,"content_creation":270,"compute":272,"ai":276,"efficiency":279,"value":281},{"single_core":268,"cache_factor":269,"frequency_factor":94},95.4,1.47,{"compute":261,"memory":271,"sustained_power":222},58,{"architecture":273,"parallel":274,"frequency":275,"sustained_power":222},90,80,88.33,{"instruction":277,"ai_acceleration":95,"compute":278,"memory":222},30,80.93,{"performance_index":280,"effective_power":234,"performance_efficiency":263,"power_feature":263,"platform_efficiency":263},155.05,{"capability":282,"resource_cost":283,"core_cost":284,"power_cost":95,"platform_cost":285},154.78,596,320,20,{"id":287,"slug":288,"name":289,"brand":290,"gee_cool_page":291,"intro":292,"features":293,"metrics":295,"highlights":311,"scores":321},"5HJLwSvB2KwCC62mQPzF-w","xeon-platinum-8581v","Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8581V Processor","intel","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fxeon-platinum-8581v","300M Cache, 2.00 GHz",[216,294],"amx",{"cores":296,"threads":299,"boost":302,"cache":305,"tdp":308},{"value":297,"display":298,"percent":222},60,"60 \u002F 120",{"value":300,"display":301,"percent":222},120,"120",{"value":303,"display":304,"percent":46},3.9,"3.9 GHz",{"value":306,"display":307,"percent":222},300,"300 MB",{"value":309,"display":310,"percent":95},270,"270 W",[312,314,315,316,317,319],{"key":238,"label":239,"value":313},"FCLGA4677",{"key":242,"label":243,"value":307},{"key":245,"label":246,"value":304},{"key":248,"label":249,"value":310},{"key":251,"label":252,"value":318},"DDR5 @ 4800 MT\u002Fs (1 DPC)",{"key":255,"label":256,"value":320},"Q4'23",{"gaming_index":322,"content_creation_index":323,"compute_index":324,"ai_index":325,"efficiency_index":326,"value_index":327,"g_score":328,"breakdown":329},170.82,96.12,94.6,92.3,96.13,24.08,101.92,{"gaming":330,"content_creation":333,"compute":335,"ai":336,"efficiency":338,"value":341},{"single_core":331,"cache_factor":332,"frequency_factor":94},70.2,2.36,{"compute":324,"memory":334,"sustained_power":222},94,{"architecture":38,"parallel":222,"frequency":46,"sustained_power":222},{"instruction":222,"ai_acceleration":95,"compute":337,"memory":222},86,{"performance_index":339,"effective_power":309,"performance_efficiency":326,"power_feature":340,"platform_efficiency":326},117.25,83.68,{"capability":342,"resource_cost":343,"core_cost":344,"power_cost":95,"platform_cost":285},272.79,1100,600,{"template_seed":346,"winner_g_score":328,"loser_g_score":265,"g_score_delta_percent":347,"top_scenario_id":348,"top_scenario_delta_percent":349,"winner_lead_count":101,"is_close_call":350},27213,4,"ai",34,true,[352,353,355,357,358,360],{"id":112,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":259,"scoreB":322,"advice":9},{"id":354,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":260,"scoreB":323,"advice":9},"contentCreation",{"id":356,"winnerSlug":210,"scoreA":261,"scoreB":324,"advice":9},"compute",{"id":348,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":262,"scoreB":325,"advice":9},{"id":359,"winnerSlug":210,"scoreA":263,"scoreB":326,"advice":9},"efficiency",{"id":361,"winnerSlug":210,"scoreA":264,"scoreB":327,"advice":9},"value",[363,368,371,374,376,377,379],{"key":364,"label":365,"valueA":366,"valueB":366,"winner":367},"hw_type","硬件类型","CPU","tie",{"key":123,"label":369,"valueA":221,"valueB":298,"winner":370},"核心 \u002F 线程","b",{"key":245,"label":372,"valueA":228,"valueB":304,"winner":373},"最高 Boost","a",{"key":242,"label":375,"valueA":232,"valueB":307,"winner":370},"L3 缓存",{"key":248,"label":249,"valueA":235,"valueB":310,"winner":370},{"key":238,"label":378,"valueA":240,"valueB":313,"winner":367},"平台",{"key":251,"label":380,"valueA":253,"valueB":318,"winner":367},"内存支持",[382,384,386],{"id":112,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":383},18,{"id":354,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":385},7,{"id":387,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":347},"overall",[389,410],{"page":213,"isCompared":350,"list":390},[391,395,399,403,406],{"slug":112,"type":112,"question":392,"answer":393,"page":213,"heat":394},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 能打游戏吗？买来当游戏机合不合适？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程的 WRX90 平台处理器。能跑，但为游戏买 WRX90 平台就是预算打水漂：游戏不稀罕 64 线程，单核性能它也不占优。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  真买了干活为主的机器，游戏用主流显卡在 2K\u002F4K 玩，体验可以接受。纯游戏需求请完全绕开工作站平台。\u003C\u002Fp>",172,{"slug":348,"type":348,"question":396,"answer":397,"page":213,"heat":398},"手里已有 7975WX，为 AI 换到 9975WX，值那 0.1GHz 的差价吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  不值，这 0.1GHz 的睿频差在 AI 负载里约等于噪声。7975WX 的 32 核 64 线程、128MB L3 和 8 通道 DDR5 与当代款同处一档，两边跑的又是同一套 AVX-512 量化推理；换代真正能拿到的，是平台层面的新特性，不是延迟上摸得着的提升。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  动手前先给现役机器把脉：卡在核数就上 64 核 PRO，卡在带宽就插满 8 通道，都卡不到就先按兵不动。若只是觉得旧编号掉价，把预算拨给显卡或内存，体感来得更快。真实瓶颈在哪，钱就往哪去。\u003C\u002Fp>",167,{"slug":123,"type":123,"question":400,"answer":401,"page":213,"heat":402},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是多少核、多少线程？适合什么场景，不适合什么场景？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程，WRX90 工作站平台。渲染、编译、虚拟机是主场，八通道 ECC 内存是硬卖点。和消费级 32 核比，它的差异不在核数而在平台：内存容量上限、PCIe 通道数、7×24 稳定性。软件并行度不足的话，多线程资源就浪费了，买前用实际负载测并行度。\u003C\u002Fp>",165,{"slug":151,"type":151,"question":404,"answer":405,"page":213,"heat":402},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  7975WX 是 350W 平台：sTR5 认证冷头。长期全核建议 360\u002F420mm 水冷，风冷只在 OEM 认证的工作站机箱里考虑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  验收看全核 10 分钟的功耗频率曲线，游戏负载不能当依据。\u003C\u002Fp>",{"slug":166,"type":166,"question":407,"answer":408,"page":213,"heat":409},"给 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  WRX90 + sTR5 + 八通道 DDR5 ECC RDIMM。选板流程：查 CPU\u002FBIOS 支持、查内存 QVL、看 350W 供电和 VRM 散热、按需 PCIe 5.0\u002FM.2\u002F网口\u002F管理口。内存按通道规则对称插满。工作站的板子没有\"便宜大碗\"选项，兼容性优先。\u003C\u002Fp>",162,{"page":291,"isCompared":350,"list":411},[412],{"slug":348,"type":348,"question":413,"answer":414,"page":291,"heat":415},"Xeon Platinum 8581V 的 300MB L3 对高并发轻量 AI 服务能圈住多少工作集？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  圈住一批“小而热”的模型与索引刚刚好：embedding、打分、重排这类请求每个只碰几 MB 数据，却要成百上千并发，60 核 120 线程把并发摊平后，300MB L3 让高频命中的权重留在片上，8 通道最高 4096GB 再兜住全部冷数据。轻量服务的工作集几乎不再出缓存，这是它吞吐好看的直接原因。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">  搜广推链路里的向量召回与精排打分，拿它当 CPU 底座很对路；长文本生成这类要吃满带宽与容量的活，300MB 圈不下也兜不住，该交给带宽更大的兄弟款。压测时盯着 L3 命中率调 batch，命中率上去，这 300MB 才算是花对了地方。\u003C\u002Fp>",137]