[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home:siteConfig":3,"decision-compare:brand":17,"decision-compare:faq-hot:zh":36,"decision-compare:related-list:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568y":133,"decision-compare:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568y":208,"decision-compare:faq:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568y":386},{"code":4,"data":5,"msg":16},1000,{"s_title":6,"s_slogan":7,"s_description":8,"s_keywords":9,"s_logo_url":10,"s_favicon_url":11,"s_og_image_url":12,"s_site_url":13,"s_og_title":6,"s_og_description":8,"s_icp":14,"s_gongan_icp":9,"s_copyright":15},"极库","极客装机，酷无止境","极库（GeeCool）是 DIY 硬件社区，分享装机作品、发现装机灵感，探索 CPU、显卡、内存等硬件信息，与极客玩家一起交流。","","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Flogo\u002F852e2056-6a54-4c8c-ab3a-b423075227df.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Ffavicon\u002F8a8d0f4e-a624-4a59-a38f-502c1e017480.ico","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Fog\u002F28d69746-a0ef-4aa0-825f-38d9562c3a57.png","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.geecool.net","蜀ICP备2024109955号-2","© 2026 GeeCool. All rights reserved.","成功",{"code":4,"data":18,"msg":16},[19,26,31],{"id":20,"sort":21,"s_name":22,"s_identifier":23,"s_icon_url":24,"s_wide_image_url":25},1,0,"Intel","INTEL","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F7a8f0d43-aa34-4ae6-b527-5e4dd4406b3a.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F5fa18192-e149-4a29-b005-d8fb84fb6d6c.png",{"id":27,"sort":21,"s_name":28,"s_identifier":29,"s_icon_url":30,"s_wide_image_url":9},3,"Nvidia","NVIDIA","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F36e9735e-c4fd-4e81-9f8e-7be5e8b28ef1.png",{"id":32,"sort":20,"s_name":33,"s_identifier":33,"s_icon_url":34,"s_wide_image_url":35},2,"AMD","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002Fcb1f17f9-d291-4f7c-b323-799f5f66976c.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F32656cc6-804f-45ae-9d66-7953b3f40855.png",[37,43,49,54,59,64,67,72,76,80,86,91,96,101,106,110,116,120,124,129],{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":39,"answer":40,"page":41,"heat":42},"gaming","用 Core Ultra 5 325 装机打游戏，1080p、2K、4K 怎么配显卡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程打游戏完全够，瓶颈几乎永远在显卡。1080p 高刷配 RTX 5060\u002F5070 级别，2K 配 5070 Ti 或 RX 9070 XT 级别，4K 就把预算全给显卡和显存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;一句话：预算往显卡倾斜，CPU 选它不会成为短板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-325",437,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":45,"answer":46,"page":47,"heat":48},"cores","Core Ultra 7 356H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程，H 后缀代表高性能移动平台。游戏的 1080p 高刷看单核和独显 TGP，2K\u002F4K 通常看 GPU；编译、编码、剪辑和 CPU 渲染可利用 16 条线程，但长时间性能必须核对 CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式和共享散热。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;具体机型的 10 至 15 分钟功耗\u002F频率日志比峰值睿频更能说明它是否适合长任务。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-356h",388,{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":50,"answer":51,"page":52,"heat":53},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225U 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225U 只有 2 个 P 核，单核性能可应付网游但无法支撑 3A 大作；核显较弱，1080p 低画质下 LOL、CS2 勉强流畅。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它面向长续航办公场景，游戏不是设计重点。以游戏为主要需求，H 系列独显本更合适。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225u",385,{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":55,"answer":56,"page":57,"heat":58},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 5 225H 是 14 核 14 线程的标压 H 系，配主流独显打游戏完全够格，帧数卡不卡看两件事：独显型号+实际 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost），以及这台机的 CPU 持续包功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;1080p 高刷或电竞游戏对 CPU 帧时间敏感，2K\u002F4K 基本由 GPU 决定。想验证瓶颈，插电开性能模式，用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟游戏：GPU 利用率接近 95% 且功耗贴近 TGP，就是显卡限制；GPU 利用率上不去（低于约 90%）而 CPU 有线程饱和，则检查 CPU 功耗墙、散热和性能模式。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225h",383,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":60,"answer":61,"page":62,"heat":63},"Core Ultra 7 255H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 16 线程，注意 Arrow Lake 移动版同样没有超线程。游戏、开发、中度剪辑按这个规模看是够的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;大型编译和长视频导出能吃满全部线程，但笔记本能不能一直保持这个性能，取决于整机功耗墙、独显 TGP 和散热，光看型号没意义。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255h",376,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":65,"answer":66,"page":57,"heat":63},"Core Ultra 5 225H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14 核 14 线程（4 性能核 + 8 能效核 + 2 低功耗核），性能核基频 1.7GHz、睿频 4.9GHz，L3 缓存 18MB，Arrow Lake 平台，2025 年 Q1 发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225H 和 235H 同架构，只是基频低一些，日常体验几乎无差别；14 线程在游戏、开发、剪辑里都够，持续重负载受笔记本功耗墙限制。这个档位选机器看价格和模具散热就行。\u003C\u002Fp>",{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":68,"answer":69,"page":70,"heat":71},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 24 核 24 线程的 HX 处理器。游戏性能主要看显卡和模具，255HX 不是瓶颈：两台机摆一起，一台上 4060 满功耗加独显直连，一台上 4070 但 80W 锁功耗还没直连，前者游戏体验可能更好。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;选 255HX 游戏本：显卡 TGP、MUX、性能模式功耗，三样确认完再比价。CPU 型号本身不用纠结。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255hx",374,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":73,"answer":74,"page":70,"heat":75},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 20 核 20 线程（8 性能核 + 12 能效核，无超线程），Arrow Lake，基础 2.4GHz、最高 5.2GHz，L3 30MB。它和 265HX 是同一颗硅片的两个频率档位，规格几乎一样，265HX 只是睿频略高 0.1GHz，实际跑游戏、剪视频、编译的差距都在 3% 以内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;所以选机器时这两个型号不值得纠结，同一模具下的 255HX 和 265HX 用起来几乎没有区别。真正决定这台 HX 本性能上限的是整机的功耗释放和散热设计，同样是 20 核 20 线程，给 60W 和给 150W 是两台不同的电脑。\u003C\u002Fp>",371,{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":77,"answer":78,"page":62,"heat":79},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255H 游戏本先看独显 TGP 和 CPU 持续功耗，16 核 16 线程只是其次。1080p 高刷更吃 CPU 内存，2K\u002F4K 先看显卡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;买之前核对 TGP、插电后两种模式下的实际功耗、有没有独显直连。同名显卡 TGP 差一截，比处理器型号更能改变游戏结果。\u003C\u002Fp>",369,{"slug":81,"type":81,"question":82,"answer":83,"page":84,"heat":85},"cooling","Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏 270K Plus 用高规格双塔或 240\u002F280 水冷。解除功耗限制后持续全核编译编码渲染超 180W，就上顶级双塔或 360 水冷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跑 15-20 分钟全核看包功耗、频率和 VRM 状态，掉得明显就降功耗或升级散热。确认 LGA1851 扣具和机箱排热。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-270k-plus",366,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":87,"answer":88,"page":89,"heat":90},"Core i7 14650HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 24 线程的 HX 移动 U，游戏本常见配置。这规格的“够不够”关键在整机能不能一直喂饱，而不只是参数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;办公、多任务按规格判断就行；编码、渲染得看具体机型。14 代 HX 记得更新 BIOS 微码。同样的 U，厚机本比轻薄本强得多。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i7-14650hx",363,{"slug":92,"type":92,"question":93,"answer":94,"page":84,"heat":95},"motherboard","给 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;270K Plus 使用 LGA1851、800 系列芯片组与 DDR5。超频选 Z890，默认使用选供电扎实的 B860，H810 难以承载 24 核高功耗持续负载。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;核对 BIOS 与 CPU 支持表，再按显卡、M.2、USB、网卡与 VRM 散热取舍。长期编译渲染的预算优先给供电与散热，而非装饰性接口。\u003C\u002Fp>",348,{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":97,"answer":98,"page":99,"heat":100},"Core i5 14400F 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14400F 配中端独显很合适：1080p 高刷更看 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K\u002F4K 基本是显卡决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跟便宜型号比，锁同一显卡、内存、驱动和功耗设置，再看同场景的 1% low。如果你还要边玩边直播、录制或编译，注意 CPU 会不会长期满载，多线程负载比单纯打游戏更早碰到功耗和散热天花板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14400f",341,{"slug":102,"type":102,"question":103,"answer":104,"page":89,"heat":105},"power","Core i7 14650HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;短时间使用的话，性能模式的意义不大，那是给持续满载任务准备的。14650HX 的额定功耗不是实际功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;开不开性能模式，看任务时长、噪声和散热余量。短任务用平衡就够，风扇也安静不少。\u003C\u002Fp>",340,{"slug":102,"type":102,"question":107,"answer":108,"page":70,"heat":109},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 的功耗模式实测方法照旧：性能模式全核 10 分钟，看 Package Power 和 GPU 功耗分配。这代 HX 的功耗策略整体不错，但机身散热仍是天花板。插电打游戏或渲染开性能模式，风扇噪音大点就大点；离电办公平衡模式，续航更重要。\u003C\u002Fp>",339,{"slug":111,"type":112,"question":113,"answer":114,"page":70,"heat":115},"battery","general","搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 平台轻办公约 5 小时，游戏必须插电。离电省电就三样：混合显卡、60Hz、平衡模式。后台软件和屏幕亮度对续航的影响比 CPU 型号大，对比两台机器先把这些条件对齐。想要长续航，选轻薄本，不是 HX 本。\u003C\u002Fp>",337,{"slug":111,"type":112,"question":117,"answer":118,"page":89,"heat":119},"搭载 Core i7 14650HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;续航是整机指标：电池容量、屏幕和低负载功耗决定办公续航，独显功耗和插电条件决定游戏体验。14650HX 无法单独推算出小时数。HX 机型不插电游戏基本不现实，办公续航重点看电池 Wh 和混合显卡设置。\u003C\u002Fp>",326,{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":121,"answer":122,"page":84,"heat":123},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 24 核 24 线程（Arrow Lake 无超线程）的桌面处理器。1080p 高刷吃 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K 是 CPU\u002FGPU 平衡，4K 基本看显卡；24 核更适合边编译、边直播、边渲染的用法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;对比便宜型号时固定显卡、内存、驱动和 BIOS 功耗，测同场景帧时间。核心数不能替代实测，别据此报帧数。游戏场景它的性价比一般，生产力才是主场。\u003C\u002Fp>",320,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":125,"answer":126,"page":127,"heat":128},"Core i5 14600KF 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14600KF 是 14 核 20 线程（6 性能核 + 8 能效核），无核显，是 2023 年的甜点 i5。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏和轻度生产力通吃，20 线程渲染编译也够。KF 无核显必须配独显，价格比 14600K 便宜一点点。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14600kf",318,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":130,"answer":131,"page":41,"heat":132},"Core Ultra 5 325 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程（无超线程），LGA1851 平台的中端桌面 U。对绝大多数人，游戏+办公+轻中度生产力都在舒适区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是今年 Intel 主流装机里性价比不错的选项，比带超线程的高端款便宜不少，游戏差距却不大。\u003C\u002Fp>",315,[134,138,142,148,152,156,160,164,168,172,174,178,182,186,188,192,195,198,202,205],{"slug_a":135,"slug_b":136,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":137},"core-i7-13645hx","core-i7-13700hx",131,{"slug_a":139,"slug_b":140,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":141},"ryzen-threadripper-pro-3955wx","xeon-platinum-9282",81,{"slug_a":143,"slug_b":144,"name_a":145,"name_b":146,"i_heat":147},"core-i5-12490f","core-i5-13600kf","Intel® Core™ i5-12490F Processor","Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor",76,{"slug_a":149,"slug_b":150,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":151},"core-ultra-9-275hx","core-ultra-9-290hx-plus",75,{"slug_a":153,"slug_b":154,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":155},"core-i5-1340pe","core-i5-13600h",71,{"slug_a":157,"slug_b":158,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":159},"core-i7-14650hx","core-ultra-7-251hx",70,{"slug_a":161,"slug_b":162,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":163},"core-i5-13600t","core-ultra-5-245hx",65,{"slug_a":165,"slug_b":166,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":167},"core-ultra-7-255h","core-ultra-7-356h",57,{"slug_a":169,"slug_b":170,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":171},"ryzen-9-8945hx","ryzen-9-9955hx",52,{"slug_a":158,"slug_b":173,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":171},"core-ultra-7-255hx",{"slug_a":175,"slug_b":176,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":177},"core-m-5y71","ryzen-ai-5-340",50,{"slug_a":179,"slug_b":180,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":181},"core-i5-14400f","core-i5-14490f",48,{"slug_a":183,"slug_b":184,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":185},"core-i3-1215ue","core-i3-12300he",47,{"slug_a":173,"slug_b":166,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":187},46,{"slug_a":189,"slug_b":190,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":191},"core-i5-14600kf","core-ultra-5-250k-plus",44,{"slug_a":193,"slug_b":194,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":191},"core-ultra-5-225h","core-ultra-5-235h",{"slug_a":196,"slug_b":150,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":197},"core-i9-13900hx",43,{"slug_a":199,"slug_b":200,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":201},"core-i9-10980xe-extreme-edition","ryzen-9-pro-9965",42,{"slug_a":194,"slug_b":203,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":204},"core-ultra-5-235hx",41,{"slug_a":206,"slug_b":207,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":204},"core-ultra-7-265k","core-ultra-7-270k-plus",{"cpuA":209,"cpuB":286,"winnerSlug":288,"recommendation":344,"scenarios":349,"diffRows":360,"faq":379},{"id":210,"slug":211,"name":212,"brand":213,"gee_cool_page":214,"intro":215,"features":216,"metrics":219,"highlights":237,"scores":259},"Xg96d5D3tGyjH4ibh5xZ8g","ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX","amd","\u002Fcpu\u002Famd\u002Fryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","Get drivers and downloads for the latest version of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX",[217,218],"large_cache","avx512",{"cores":220,"threads":224,"boost":227,"cache":231,"tdp":234},{"value":221,"display":222,"percent":223},32,"32 \u002F 64",100,{"value":225,"display":226,"percent":223},64,"64",{"value":228,"display":229,"percent":230},5.3,"5.3 GHz",88,{"value":232,"display":233,"percent":223},128,"128 MB",{"value":235,"display":236,"percent":21},350,"350 W",[238,242,245,248,251,255],{"key":239,"label":240,"value":241},"socket","插槽","sTR5",{"key":243,"label":244,"value":233},"cache","三级缓存",{"key":246,"label":247,"value":229},"boost","最高频率",{"key":249,"label":250,"value":236},"tdp","TDP",{"key":252,"label":253,"value":254},"memory","内存","DDR5",{"key":256,"label":257,"value":258},"launch","上市","10\u002F19\u002F2023",{"gaming_index":260,"content_creation_index":261,"compute_index":262,"ai_index":263,"efficiency_index":264,"value_index":265,"g_score":266,"breakdown":267},144.12,89.67,96.53,68.51,113.36,25.62,97.63,{"gaming":268,"content_creation":271,"compute":273,"ai":277,"efficiency":280,"value":282},{"single_core":269,"cache_factor":270,"frequency_factor":20},95.4,1.47,{"compute":262,"memory":272,"sustained_power":223},58,{"architecture":274,"parallel":275,"frequency":276,"sustained_power":223},90,80,88.33,{"instruction":278,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":279,"memory":223},30,80.93,{"performance_index":281,"effective_power":235,"performance_efficiency":264,"power_feature":264,"platform_efficiency":264},155.05,{"capability":283,"resource_cost":284,"core_cost":123,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":285},154.78,596,20,{"id":287,"slug":288,"name":289,"brand":290,"gee_cool_page":291,"intro":292,"features":293,"metrics":295,"highlights":309,"scores":319},"RtsKMY-Y-dQz-jYDCiHPsA","xeon-platinum-8568y","Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8568Y+ Processor","intel","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fxeon-platinum-8568y","300M Cache, 2.30 GHz",[217,294],"amx",{"cores":296,"threads":298,"boost":301,"cache":305,"tdp":308},{"value":181,"display":297,"percent":223},"48 \u002F 96",{"value":299,"display":300,"percent":223},96,"96",{"value":302,"display":303,"percent":304},4,"4.0 GHz",66,{"value":306,"display":307,"percent":223},300,"300 MB",{"value":235,"display":236,"percent":21},[310,312,313,314,315,317],{"key":239,"label":240,"value":311},"FCLGA4677",{"key":243,"label":244,"value":307},{"key":246,"label":247,"value":303},{"key":249,"label":250,"value":236},{"key":252,"label":253,"value":316},"DDR5 @ 5600 MT\u002Fs (1 DPC)",{"key":256,"label":257,"value":318},"Q4'23",{"gaming_index":320,"content_creation_index":321,"compute_index":322,"ai_index":323,"efficiency_index":324,"value_index":325,"g_score":326,"breakdown":327},175.2,96.31,94.88,92.44,80.95,25.5,101.28,{"gaming":328,"content_creation":331,"compute":333,"ai":335,"efficiency":337,"value":340},{"single_core":329,"cache_factor":330,"frequency_factor":20},72,2.36,{"compute":322,"memory":332,"sustained_power":223},94,{"architecture":151,"parallel":223,"frequency":334,"sustained_power":223},66.67,{"instruction":223,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":336,"memory":223},86.25,{"performance_index":338,"effective_power":235,"performance_efficiency":324,"power_feature":339,"platform_efficiency":324},104,70.47,{"capability":341,"resource_cost":342,"core_cost":343,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":285},231.15,884,480,{"template_seed":345,"winner_g_score":326,"loser_g_score":266,"g_score_delta_percent":27,"top_scenario_id":346,"top_scenario_delta_percent":347,"winner_lead_count":27,"is_close_call":348},46930,"ai",34,true,[350,351,353,355,356,358],{"id":38,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":260,"scoreB":320,"advice":9},{"id":352,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":261,"scoreB":321,"advice":9},"contentCreation",{"id":354,"winnerSlug":211,"scoreA":262,"scoreB":322,"advice":9},"compute",{"id":346,"winnerSlug":288,"scoreA":263,"scoreB":323,"advice":9},{"id":357,"winnerSlug":211,"scoreA":264,"scoreB":324,"advice":9},"efficiency",{"id":359,"winnerSlug":211,"scoreA":265,"scoreB":325,"advice":9},"value",[361,366,369,372,374,375,377],{"key":362,"label":363,"valueA":364,"valueB":364,"winner":365},"hw_type","硬件类型","CPU","tie",{"key":44,"label":367,"valueA":222,"valueB":297,"winner":368},"核心 \u002F 线程","b",{"key":246,"label":370,"valueA":229,"valueB":303,"winner":371},"最高 Boost","a",{"key":243,"label":373,"valueA":233,"valueB":307,"winner":368},"L3 缓存",{"key":249,"label":250,"valueA":236,"valueB":236,"winner":365},{"key":239,"label":376,"valueA":241,"valueB":311,"winner":365},"平台",{"key":252,"label":378,"valueA":254,"valueB":316,"winner":365},"内存支持",[380,382,384],{"id":38,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":381},21,{"id":352,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":383},7,{"id":385,"winner_slug":288,"delta_percent":27},"overall",[387,409],{"page":214,"isCompared":348,"list":388},[389,393,397,401,405],{"slug":38,"type":38,"question":390,"answer":391,"page":214,"heat":392},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 能打游戏吗？买来当游戏机合不合适？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程的 WRX90 平台处理器。能跑，但为游戏买 WRX90 平台就是预算打水漂：游戏不稀罕 64 线程，单核性能它也不占优。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;真买了干活为主的机器，游戏用主流显卡在 2K\u002F4K 玩，体验可以接受。纯游戏需求请完全绕开工作站平台。\u003C\u002Fp>",171,{"slug":346,"type":346,"question":394,"answer":395,"page":214,"heat":396},"手里已有 7975WX，为 AI 换到 9975WX，值那 0.1GHz 的差价吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;不值，这 0.1GHz 的睿频差在 AI 负载里约等于噪声。7975WX 的 32 核 64 线程、128MB L3 和 8 通道 DDR5 与当代款同处一档，两边跑的又是同一套 AVX-512 量化推理；换代真正能拿到的，是平台层面的新特性，不是延迟上摸得着的提升。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;动手前先给现役机器把脉：卡在核数就上 64 核 PRO，卡在带宽就插满 8 通道，都卡不到就先按兵不动。若只是觉得旧编号掉价，把预算拨给显卡或内存，体感来得更快。真实瓶颈在哪，钱就往哪去。\u003C\u002Fp>",167,{"slug":81,"type":81,"question":398,"answer":399,"page":214,"heat":400},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;7975WX 是 350W 平台：sTR5 认证冷头。长期全核建议 360\u002F420mm 水冷，风冷只在 OEM 认证的工作站机箱里考虑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;验收看全核 10 分钟的功耗频率曲线，游戏负载不能当依据。\u003C\u002Fp>",164,{"slug":44,"type":44,"question":402,"answer":403,"page":214,"heat":404},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是多少核、多少线程？适合什么场景，不适合什么场景？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程，WRX90 工作站平台。渲染、编译、虚拟机是主场，八通道 ECC 内存是硬卖点。和消费级 32 核比，它的差异不在核数而在平台：内存容量上限、PCIe 通道数、7×24 稳定性。软件并行度不足的话，多线程资源就浪费了，买前用实际负载测并行度。\u003C\u002Fp>",162,{"slug":92,"type":92,"question":406,"answer":407,"page":214,"heat":408},"给 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;WRX90 + sTR5 + 八通道 DDR5 ECC RDIMM。选板流程：查 CPU\u002FBIOS 支持、查内存 QVL、看 350W 供电和 VRM 散热、按需 PCIe 5.0\u002FM.2\u002F网口\u002F管理口。内存按通道规则对称插满。工作站的板子没有\"便宜大碗\"选项，兼容性优先。\u003C\u002Fp>",161,{"page":291,"isCompared":348,"list":410},[411],{"slug":346,"type":346,"question":412,"answer":413,"page":291,"heat":414},"几十路并发的 AI 会话共用同一只小模型，Xeon Platinum 8568Y+ 的 300MB L3 把权重留在片上，赢面会不会大半落在缓存命中上？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;这个场景里，命中就是赢面。权重整套躺在 300MB L3 内，每个请求都省一次内存往返，48 核 96 线程配合 AMX 把省下的时间直接转成并发吞吐，4GHz 睿频再压住单请求的尾巴。前提卡得很死：模型得小到装得进缓存，溢出 300MB 的权重流照样回落到 8 通道内存去排队。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跑大量并发小模型推理、又在意延迟的团队，这笔缓存预算花得值；模型动辄上百 GB、权重流远大于缓存的，优势会被摊薄，预算该转向内存与核数。上线前先量工作集和 L3 的贴合度，命中率数字比任何纸面参数都诚实。\u003C\u002Fp>",127]