[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home:siteConfig":3,"decision-compare:faq-hot:zh":17,"decision-compare:brand":114,"decision-compare:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8558":133,"decision-compare:related-list:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8558":315,"decision-compare:faq:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8558":388},{"code":4,"data":5,"msg":16},1000,{"s_title":6,"s_slogan":7,"s_description":8,"s_keywords":9,"s_logo_url":10,"s_favicon_url":11,"s_og_image_url":12,"s_site_url":13,"s_og_title":6,"s_og_description":8,"s_icp":14,"s_gongan_icp":9,"s_copyright":15},"极库","极客装机，酷无止境","极库（GeeCool）是 DIY 硬件社区，分享装机作品、发现装机灵感，探索 CPU、显卡、内存等硬件信息，与极客玩家一起交流。","","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Flogo\u002F852e2056-6a54-4c8c-ab3a-b423075227df.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Ffavicon\u002F8a8d0f4e-a624-4a59-a38f-502c1e017480.ico","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Fog\u002F28d69746-a0ef-4aa0-825f-38d9562c3a57.png","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.geecool.net","蜀ICP备2024109955号-2","© 2026 GeeCool. All rights reserved.","成功",[18,24,30,35,40,45,48,53,57,61,67,72,77,82,87,91,97,101,105,110],{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":20,"answer":21,"page":22,"heat":23},"gaming","用 Core Ultra 5 325 装机打游戏，1080p、2K、4K 怎么配显卡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程打游戏完全够，瓶颈几乎永远在显卡。1080p 高刷配 RTX 5060\u002F5070 级别，2K 配 5070 Ti 或 RX 9070 XT 级别，4K 就把预算全给显卡和显存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;一句话：预算往显卡倾斜，CPU 选它不会成为短板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-325",437,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":26,"answer":27,"page":28,"heat":29},"cores","Core Ultra 7 356H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程，H 后缀代表高性能移动平台。游戏的 1080p 高刷看单核和独显 TGP，2K\u002F4K 通常看 GPU；编译、编码、剪辑和 CPU 渲染可利用 16 条线程，但长时间性能必须核对 CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式和共享散热。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;具体机型的 10 至 15 分钟功耗\u002F频率日志比峰值睿频更能说明它是否适合长任务。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-356h",388,{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":31,"answer":32,"page":33,"heat":34},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225U 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225U 只有 2 个 P 核，单核性能可应付网游但无法支撑 3A 大作；核显较弱，1080p 低画质下 LOL、CS2 勉强流畅。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它面向长续航办公场景，游戏不是设计重点。以游戏为主要需求，H 系列独显本更合适。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225u",385,{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":36,"answer":37,"page":38,"heat":39},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 5 225H 是 14 核 14 线程的标压 H 系，配主流独显打游戏完全够格，帧数卡不卡看两件事：独显型号+实际 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost），以及这台机的 CPU 持续包功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;1080p 高刷或电竞游戏对 CPU 帧时间敏感，2K\u002F4K 基本由 GPU 决定。想验证瓶颈，插电开性能模式，用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟游戏：GPU 利用率接近 95% 且功耗贴近 TGP，就是显卡限制；GPU 利用率上不去（低于约 90%）而 CPU 有线程饱和，则检查 CPU 功耗墙、散热和性能模式。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225h",383,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":41,"answer":42,"page":43,"heat":44},"Core Ultra 7 255H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 16 线程，注意 Arrow Lake 移动版同样没有超线程。游戏、开发、中度剪辑按这个规模看是够的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;大型编译和长视频导出能吃满全部线程，但笔记本能不能一直保持这个性能，取决于整机功耗墙、独显 TGP 和散热，光看型号没意义。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255h",376,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":46,"answer":47,"page":38,"heat":44},"Core Ultra 5 225H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14 核 14 线程（4 性能核 + 8 能效核 + 2 低功耗核），性能核基频 1.7GHz、睿频 4.9GHz，L3 缓存 18MB，Arrow Lake 平台，2025 年 Q1 发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225H 和 235H 同架构，只是基频低一些，日常体验几乎无差别；14 线程在游戏、开发、剪辑里都够，持续重负载受笔记本功耗墙限制。这个档位选机器看价格和模具散热就行。\u003C\u002Fp>",{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":49,"answer":50,"page":51,"heat":52},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 24 核 24 线程的 HX 处理器。游戏性能主要看显卡和模具，255HX 不是瓶颈：两台机摆一起，一台上 4060 满功耗加独显直连，一台上 4070 但 80W 锁功耗还没直连，前者游戏体验可能更好。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;选 255HX 游戏本：显卡 TGP、MUX、性能模式功耗，三样确认完再比价。CPU 型号本身不用纠结。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255hx",374,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":54,"answer":55,"page":51,"heat":56},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 20 核 20 线程（8 性能核 + 12 能效核，无超线程），Arrow Lake，基础 2.4GHz、最高 5.2GHz，L3 30MB。它和 265HX 是同一颗硅片的两个频率档位，规格几乎一样，265HX 只是睿频略高 0.1GHz，实际跑游戏、剪视频、编译的差距都在 3% 以内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;所以选机器时这两个型号不值得纠结，同一模具下的 255HX 和 265HX 用起来几乎没有区别。真正决定这台 HX 本性能上限的是整机的功耗释放和散热设计，同样是 20 核 20 线程，给 60W 和给 150W 是两台不同的电脑。\u003C\u002Fp>",371,{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":58,"answer":59,"page":43,"heat":60},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255H 游戏本先看独显 TGP 和 CPU 持续功耗，16 核 16 线程只是其次。1080p 高刷更吃 CPU 内存，2K\u002F4K 先看显卡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;买之前核对 TGP、插电后两种模式下的实际功耗、有没有独显直连。同名显卡 TGP 差一截，比处理器型号更能改变游戏结果。\u003C\u002Fp>",369,{"slug":62,"type":62,"question":63,"answer":64,"page":65,"heat":66},"cooling","Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏 270K Plus 用高规格双塔或 240\u002F280 水冷。解除功耗限制后持续全核编译编码渲染超 180W，就上顶级双塔或 360 水冷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跑 15-20 分钟全核看包功耗、频率和 VRM 状态，掉得明显就降功耗或升级散热。确认 LGA1851 扣具和机箱排热。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-270k-plus",366,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":68,"answer":69,"page":70,"heat":71},"Core i7 14650HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 24 线程的 HX 移动 U，游戏本常见配置。这规格的“够不够”关键在整机能不能一直喂饱，而不只是参数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;办公、多任务按规格判断就行；编码、渲染得看具体机型。14 代 HX 记得更新 BIOS 微码。同样的 U，厚机本比轻薄本强得多。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i7-14650hx",363,{"slug":73,"type":73,"question":74,"answer":75,"page":65,"heat":76},"motherboard","给 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;270K Plus 使用 LGA1851、800 系列芯片组与 DDR5。超频选 Z890，默认使用选供电扎实的 B860，H810 难以承载 24 核高功耗持续负载。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;核对 BIOS 与 CPU 支持表，再按显卡、M.2、USB、网卡与 VRM 散热取舍。长期编译渲染的预算优先给供电与散热，而非装饰性接口。\u003C\u002Fp>",348,{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":78,"answer":79,"page":80,"heat":81},"Core i5 14400F 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14400F 配中端独显很合适：1080p 高刷更看 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K\u002F4K 基本是显卡决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跟便宜型号比，锁同一显卡、内存、驱动和功耗设置，再看同场景的 1% low。如果你还要边玩边直播、录制或编译，注意 CPU 会不会长期满载，多线程负载比单纯打游戏更早碰到功耗和散热天花板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14400f",341,{"slug":83,"type":83,"question":84,"answer":85,"page":70,"heat":86},"power","Core i7 14650HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;短时间使用的话，性能模式的意义不大，那是给持续满载任务准备的。14650HX 的额定功耗不是实际功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;开不开性能模式，看任务时长、噪声和散热余量。短任务用平衡就够，风扇也安静不少。\u003C\u002Fp>",340,{"slug":83,"type":83,"question":88,"answer":89,"page":51,"heat":90},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 的功耗模式实测方法照旧：性能模式全核 10 分钟，看 Package Power 和 GPU 功耗分配。这代 HX 的功耗策略整体不错，但机身散热仍是天花板。插电打游戏或渲染开性能模式，风扇噪音大点就大点；离电办公平衡模式，续航更重要。\u003C\u002Fp>",339,{"slug":92,"type":93,"question":94,"answer":95,"page":51,"heat":96},"battery","general","搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 平台轻办公约 5 小时，游戏必须插电。离电省电就三样：混合显卡、60Hz、平衡模式。后台软件和屏幕亮度对续航的影响比 CPU 型号大，对比两台机器先把这些条件对齐。想要长续航，选轻薄本，不是 HX 本。\u003C\u002Fp>",337,{"slug":92,"type":93,"question":98,"answer":99,"page":70,"heat":100},"搭载 Core i7 14650HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;续航是整机指标：电池容量、屏幕和低负载功耗决定办公续航，独显功耗和插电条件决定游戏体验。14650HX 无法单独推算出小时数。HX 机型不插电游戏基本不现实，办公续航重点看电池 Wh 和混合显卡设置。\u003C\u002Fp>",326,{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":102,"answer":103,"page":65,"heat":104},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 24 核 24 线程（Arrow Lake 无超线程）的桌面处理器。1080p 高刷吃 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K 是 CPU\u002FGPU 平衡，4K 基本看显卡；24 核更适合边编译、边直播、边渲染的用法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;对比便宜型号时固定显卡、内存、驱动和 BIOS 功耗，测同场景帧时间。核心数不能替代实测，别据此报帧数。游戏场景它的性价比一般，生产力才是主场。\u003C\u002Fp>",320,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":106,"answer":107,"page":108,"heat":109},"Core i5 14600KF 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14600KF 是 14 核 20 线程（6 性能核 + 8 能效核），无核显，是 2023 年的甜点 i5。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏和轻度生产力通吃，20 线程渲染编译也够。KF 无核显必须配独显，价格比 14600K 便宜一点点。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14600kf",318,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":111,"answer":112,"page":22,"heat":113},"Core Ultra 5 325 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程（无超线程），LGA1851 平台的中端桌面 U。对绝大多数人，游戏+办公+轻中度生产力都在舒适区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是今年 Intel 主流装机里性价比不错的选项，比带超线程的高端款便宜不少，游戏差距却不大。\u003C\u002Fp>",315,{"code":4,"data":115,"msg":16},[116,123,128],{"id":117,"sort":118,"s_name":119,"s_identifier":120,"s_icon_url":121,"s_wide_image_url":122},1,0,"Intel","INTEL","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F7a8f0d43-aa34-4ae6-b527-5e4dd4406b3a.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F5fa18192-e149-4a29-b005-d8fb84fb6d6c.png",{"id":124,"sort":118,"s_name":125,"s_identifier":126,"s_icon_url":127,"s_wide_image_url":9},3,"Nvidia","NVIDIA","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F36e9735e-c4fd-4e81-9f8e-7be5e8b28ef1.png",{"id":129,"sort":117,"s_name":130,"s_identifier":130,"s_icon_url":131,"s_wide_image_url":132},2,"AMD","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002Fcb1f17f9-d291-4f7c-b323-799f5f66976c.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F32656cc6-804f-45ae-9d66-7953b3f40855.png",{"cpuA":134,"cpuB":211,"winnerSlug":213,"recommendation":273,"scenarios":278,"diffRows":289,"faq":308},{"id":135,"slug":136,"name":137,"brand":138,"gee_cool_page":139,"intro":140,"features":141,"metrics":144,"highlights":162,"scores":184},"Xg96d5D3tGyjH4ibh5xZ8g","ryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX","amd","\u002Fcpu\u002Famd\u002Fryzen-threadripper-pro-7975wx","Get drivers and downloads for the latest version of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 7975WX",[142,143],"large_cache","avx512",{"cores":145,"threads":149,"boost":152,"cache":156,"tdp":159},{"value":146,"display":147,"percent":148},32,"32 \u002F 64",100,{"value":150,"display":151,"percent":148},64,"64",{"value":153,"display":154,"percent":155},5.3,"5.3 GHz",88,{"value":157,"display":158,"percent":148},128,"128 MB",{"value":160,"display":161,"percent":118},350,"350 W",[163,167,170,173,176,180],{"key":164,"label":165,"value":166},"socket","插槽","sTR5",{"key":168,"label":169,"value":158},"cache","三级缓存",{"key":171,"label":172,"value":154},"boost","最高频率",{"key":174,"label":175,"value":161},"tdp","TDP",{"key":177,"label":178,"value":179},"memory","内存","DDR5",{"key":181,"label":182,"value":183},"launch","上市","10\u002F19\u002F2023",{"gaming_index":185,"content_creation_index":186,"compute_index":187,"ai_index":188,"efficiency_index":189,"value_index":190,"g_score":191,"breakdown":192},144.12,89.67,96.53,68.51,113.36,25.62,97.63,{"gaming":193,"content_creation":196,"compute":198,"ai":202,"efficiency":205,"value":207},{"single_core":194,"cache_factor":195,"frequency_factor":117},95.4,1.47,{"compute":187,"memory":197,"sustained_power":148},58,{"architecture":199,"parallel":200,"frequency":201,"sustained_power":148},90,80,88.33,{"instruction":203,"ai_acceleration":118,"compute":204,"memory":148},30,80.93,{"performance_index":206,"effective_power":160,"performance_efficiency":189,"power_feature":189,"platform_efficiency":189},155.05,{"capability":208,"resource_cost":209,"core_cost":104,"power_cost":118,"platform_cost":210},154.78,596,20,{"id":212,"slug":213,"name":214,"brand":215,"gee_cool_page":216,"intro":217,"features":218,"metrics":220,"highlights":237,"scores":247},"hq3VRrb5pEsnbMeSoSWN6w","xeon-platinum-8558","Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8558 Processor","intel","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fxeon-platinum-8558","260M Cache, 2.10 GHz",[142,219],"amx",{"cores":221,"threads":224,"boost":227,"cache":231,"tdp":234},{"value":222,"display":223,"percent":148},48,"48 \u002F 96",{"value":225,"display":226,"percent":148},96,"96",{"value":228,"display":229,"percent":230},4,"4.0 GHz",66,{"value":232,"display":233,"percent":148},260,"260 MB",{"value":235,"display":236,"percent":118},330,"330 W",[238,240,241,242,243,245],{"key":164,"label":165,"value":239},"FCLGA4677",{"key":168,"label":169,"value":233},{"key":171,"label":172,"value":229},{"key":174,"label":175,"value":236},{"key":177,"label":178,"value":244},"DDR5 @ 5200 MT\u002Fs (1 DPC)",{"key":181,"label":182,"value":246},"Q4'23",{"gaming_index":248,"content_creation_index":249,"compute_index":250,"ai_index":251,"efficiency_index":252,"value_index":253,"g_score":254,"breakdown":255},159.75,96.31,94.88,92.44,81.91,24.84,98.66,{"gaming":256,"content_creation":259,"compute":261,"ai":264,"efficiency":266,"value":269},{"single_core":257,"cache_factor":258,"frequency_factor":117},72,2.15,{"compute":250,"memory":260,"sustained_power":148},94,{"architecture":262,"parallel":148,"frequency":263,"sustained_power":148},75,66.67,{"instruction":148,"ai_acceleration":118,"compute":265,"memory":148},86.25,{"performance_index":267,"effective_power":235,"performance_efficiency":252,"power_feature":268,"platform_efficiency":252},104,71.31,{"capability":270,"resource_cost":271,"core_cost":272,"power_cost":118,"platform_cost":210},225.15,884,480,{"template_seed":274,"winner_g_score":254,"loser_g_score":191,"g_score_delta_percent":117,"top_scenario_id":275,"top_scenario_delta_percent":276,"winner_lead_count":124,"is_close_call":277},1019,"ai",34,true,[279,280,282,284,285,287],{"id":19,"winnerSlug":213,"scoreA":185,"scoreB":248,"advice":9},{"id":281,"winnerSlug":213,"scoreA":186,"scoreB":249,"advice":9},"contentCreation",{"id":283,"winnerSlug":136,"scoreA":187,"scoreB":250,"advice":9},"compute",{"id":275,"winnerSlug":213,"scoreA":188,"scoreB":251,"advice":9},{"id":286,"winnerSlug":136,"scoreA":189,"scoreB":252,"advice":9},"efficiency",{"id":288,"winnerSlug":136,"scoreA":190,"scoreB":253,"advice":9},"value",[290,295,298,301,303,304,306],{"key":291,"label":292,"valueA":293,"valueB":293,"winner":294},"hw_type","硬件类型","CPU","tie",{"key":25,"label":296,"valueA":147,"valueB":223,"winner":297},"核心 \u002F 线程","b",{"key":171,"label":299,"valueA":154,"valueB":229,"winner":300},"最高 Boost","a",{"key":168,"label":302,"valueA":158,"valueB":233,"winner":297},"L3 缓存",{"key":174,"label":175,"valueA":161,"valueB":236,"winner":297},{"key":164,"label":305,"valueA":166,"valueB":239,"winner":294},"平台",{"key":177,"label":307,"valueA":179,"valueB":244,"winner":294},"内存支持",[309,311,313],{"id":19,"winner_slug":213,"delta_percent":310},10,{"id":281,"winner_slug":213,"delta_percent":312},7,{"id":314,"winner_slug":213,"delta_percent":117},"overall",[316,320,324,330,333,337,341,345,349,353,355,359,362,366,368,372,375,378,382,385],{"slug_a":317,"slug_b":318,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":319},"core-i7-13645hx","core-i7-13700hx",131,{"slug_a":321,"slug_b":322,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":323},"ryzen-threadripper-pro-3955wx","xeon-platinum-9282",81,{"slug_a":325,"slug_b":326,"name_a":327,"name_b":328,"i_heat":329},"core-i5-12490f","core-i5-13600kf","Intel® Core™ i5-12490F Processor","Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor",76,{"slug_a":331,"slug_b":332,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":262},"core-ultra-9-275hx","core-ultra-9-290hx-plus",{"slug_a":334,"slug_b":335,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":336},"core-i5-1340pe","core-i5-13600h",71,{"slug_a":338,"slug_b":339,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":340},"core-i7-14650hx","core-ultra-7-251hx",70,{"slug_a":342,"slug_b":343,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":344},"core-i5-13600t","core-ultra-5-245hx",65,{"slug_a":346,"slug_b":347,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":348},"core-ultra-7-255h","core-ultra-7-356h",57,{"slug_a":350,"slug_b":351,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":352},"ryzen-9-8945hx","ryzen-9-9955hx",52,{"slug_a":339,"slug_b":354,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":352},"core-ultra-7-255hx",{"slug_a":356,"slug_b":357,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":358},"core-m-5y71","ryzen-ai-5-340",50,{"slug_a":360,"slug_b":361,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":222},"core-i5-14400f","core-i5-14490f",{"slug_a":363,"slug_b":364,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":365},"core-i3-1215ue","core-i3-12300he",47,{"slug_a":354,"slug_b":347,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":367},46,{"slug_a":369,"slug_b":370,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":371},"core-i5-14600kf","core-ultra-5-250k-plus",44,{"slug_a":373,"slug_b":374,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":371},"core-ultra-5-225h","core-ultra-5-235h",{"slug_a":376,"slug_b":332,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":377},"core-i9-13900hx",43,{"slug_a":379,"slug_b":380,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":381},"core-i9-10980xe-extreme-edition","ryzen-9-pro-9965",42,{"slug_a":374,"slug_b":383,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":384},"core-ultra-5-235hx",41,{"slug_a":386,"slug_b":387,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":384},"core-ultra-7-265k","core-ultra-7-270k-plus",[389,411],{"page":139,"isCompared":277,"list":390},[391,395,399,403,407],{"slug":19,"type":19,"question":392,"answer":393,"page":139,"heat":394},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 能打游戏吗？买来当游戏机合不合适？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程的 WRX90 平台处理器。能跑，但为游戏买 WRX90 平台就是预算打水漂：游戏不稀罕 64 线程，单核性能它也不占优。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;真买了干活为主的机器，游戏用主流显卡在 2K\u002F4K 玩，体验可以接受。纯游戏需求请完全绕开工作站平台。\u003C\u002Fp>",171,{"slug":275,"type":275,"question":396,"answer":397,"page":139,"heat":398},"手里已有 7975WX，为 AI 换到 9975WX，值那 0.1GHz 的差价吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;不值，这 0.1GHz 的睿频差在 AI 负载里约等于噪声。7975WX 的 32 核 64 线程、128MB L3 和 8 通道 DDR5 与当代款同处一档，两边跑的又是同一套 AVX-512 量化推理；换代真正能拿到的，是平台层面的新特性，不是延迟上摸得着的提升。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;动手前先给现役机器把脉：卡在核数就上 64 核 PRO，卡在带宽就插满 8 通道，都卡不到就先按兵不动。若只是觉得旧编号掉价，把预算拨给显卡或内存，体感来得更快。真实瓶颈在哪，钱就往哪去。\u003C\u002Fp>",167,{"slug":62,"type":62,"question":400,"answer":401,"page":139,"heat":402},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;7975WX 是 350W 平台：sTR5 认证冷头。长期全核建议 360\u002F420mm 水冷，风冷只在 OEM 认证的工作站机箱里考虑。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;验收看全核 10 分钟的功耗频率曲线，游戏负载不能当依据。\u003C\u002Fp>",164,{"slug":25,"type":25,"question":404,"answer":405,"page":139,"heat":406},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 是多少核、多少线程？适合什么场景，不适合什么场景？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;7975WX 是 32 核 64 线程，WRX90 工作站平台。渲染、编译、虚拟机是主场，八通道 ECC 内存是硬卖点。和消费级 32 核比，它的差异不在核数而在平台：内存容量上限、PCIe 通道数、7×24 稳定性。软件并行度不足的话，多线程资源就浪费了，买前用实际负载测并行度。\u003C\u002Fp>",162,{"slug":73,"type":73,"question":408,"answer":409,"page":139,"heat":410},"给 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7975WX 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;WRX90 + sTR5 + 八通道 DDR5 ECC RDIMM。选板流程：查 CPU\u002FBIOS 支持、查内存 QVL、看 350W 供电和 VRM 散热、按需 PCIe 5.0\u002FM.2\u002F网口\u002F管理口。内存按通道规则对称插满。工作站的板子没有\"便宜大碗\"选项，兼容性优先。\u003C\u002Fp>",161,{"page":216,"isCompared":277,"list":412},[413],{"slug":275,"type":275,"question":414,"answer":415,"page":216,"heat":416},"整批语料排队做 AI 离线打分，Xeon Platinum 8558 的 48 核和 AMX 谁在真正出力，进度又会卡在哪儿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;出力的是 AMX，卡进度的是内存和 I\u002FO。打分是成批的短矩阵运算，AMX 一开，48 核 96 线程的 bf16\u002Fint8 吞吐被明显抬升，4GHz 睿频让每段文本的处理时间压得很短；可语料要从存储读进来、结果要写回去，260MB L3 只装得下权重的一角，盘和带宽往往先到顶。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;有海量离线打分需求的团队，按吞吐买它就对了；交互式单请求的活，用不着把 48 核全叫醒。跑之前把批处理框架切到 bf16\u002Fint8，确认 AMX 路径真的生效——指令集没吃到，核数再足也白搭。\u003C\u002Fp>",139]