[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home:siteConfig":3,"decision-compare:brand":17,"decision-compare:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8571n":36,"decision-compare:faq:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8571n":215,"decision-compare:faq-hot:zh":243,"decision-compare:related-list:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8571n":337},{"code":4,"data":5,"msg":16},1000,{"s_title":6,"s_slogan":7,"s_description":8,"s_keywords":9,"s_logo_url":10,"s_favicon_url":11,"s_og_image_url":12,"s_site_url":13,"s_og_title":6,"s_og_description":8,"s_icp":14,"s_gongan_icp":9,"s_copyright":15},"极库","极客装机，酷无止境","极库（GeeCool）是 DIY 硬件社区，分享装机作品、发现装机灵感，探索 CPU、显卡、内存等硬件信息，与极客玩家一起交流。","","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Flogo\u002F852e2056-6a54-4c8c-ab3a-b423075227df.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Ffavicon\u002F8a8d0f4e-a624-4a59-a38f-502c1e017480.ico","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Fog\u002F28d69746-a0ef-4aa0-825f-38d9562c3a57.png","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.geecool.net","蜀ICP备2024109955号-2","© 2026 GeeCool. All rights reserved.","成功",{"code":4,"data":18,"msg":16},[19,26,31],{"id":20,"sort":21,"s_name":22,"s_identifier":23,"s_icon_url":24,"s_wide_image_url":25},1,0,"Intel","INTEL","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F7a8f0d43-aa34-4ae6-b527-5e4dd4406b3a.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F5fa18192-e149-4a29-b005-d8fb84fb6d6c.png",{"id":27,"sort":21,"s_name":28,"s_identifier":29,"s_icon_url":30,"s_wide_image_url":9},3,"Nvidia","NVIDIA","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F36e9735e-c4fd-4e81-9f8e-7be5e8b28ef1.png",{"id":32,"sort":20,"s_name":33,"s_identifier":33,"s_icon_url":34,"s_wide_image_url":35},2,"AMD","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002Fcb1f17f9-d291-4f7c-b323-799f5f66976c.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F32656cc6-804f-45ae-9d66-7953b3f40855.png",{"cpuA":37,"cpuB":111,"winnerSlug":39,"recommendation":172,"scenarios":177,"diffRows":189,"faq":209},{"id":38,"slug":39,"name":40,"brand":41,"gee_cool_page":42,"intro":43,"features":44,"metrics":46,"highlights":64,"scores":86},"Bhx6pEqzbF8bcCx4aDHyow","ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx","AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5995WX","amd","\u002Fcpu\u002Famd\u002Fryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx","Get drivers and downloads for the latest version of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5995WX",[45],"large_cache",{"cores":47,"threads":51,"boost":54,"cache":58,"tdp":61},{"value":48,"display":49,"percent":50},64,"64 \u002F 128",100,{"value":52,"display":53,"percent":50},128,"128",{"value":55,"display":56,"percent":57},4.5,"4.5 GHz",75,{"value":59,"display":60,"percent":50},256,"256 MB",{"value":62,"display":63,"percent":21},280,"280 W",[65,69,72,75,78,82],{"key":66,"label":67,"value":68},"socket","插槽","sWRX8",{"key":70,"label":71,"value":60},"cache","三级缓存",{"key":73,"label":74,"value":56},"boost","最高频率",{"key":76,"label":77,"value":63},"tdp","TDP",{"key":79,"label":80,"value":81},"memory","内存","DDR4",{"key":83,"label":84,"value":85},"launch","上市","03\u002F08\u002F2022",{"gaming_index":87,"content_creation_index":88,"compute_index":89,"ai_index":90,"efficiency_index":91,"value_index":92,"g_score":93,"breakdown":94},177.98,86.58,98.95,52.24,218.5,25.52,114.16,{"gaming":95,"content_creation":98,"compute":100,"ai":102,"efficiency":104,"value":106},{"single_core":96,"cache_factor":97,"frequency_factor":20},81,2.13,{"compute":89,"memory":99,"sustained_power":50},36,{"architecture":101,"parallel":50,"frequency":57,"sustained_power":50},82,{"instruction":21,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":103,"memory":57},74.52,{"performance_index":105,"effective_power":62,"performance_efficiency":91,"power_feature":91,"platform_efficiency":91},282.65,{"capability":107,"resource_cost":108,"core_cost":109,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":110},282.7,1162,640,10,{"id":112,"slug":113,"name":114,"brand":115,"gee_cool_page":116,"intro":117,"features":118,"metrics":120,"highlights":136,"scores":146},"O94KnAqvTOANrQFlala-fg","xeon-platinum-8571n","Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8571N Processor","intel","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fxeon-platinum-8571n","300M Cache, 2.40 GHz",[45,119],"amx",{"cores":121,"threads":124,"boost":127,"cache":131,"tdp":134},{"value":122,"display":123,"percent":50},52,"52 \u002F 104",{"value":125,"display":126,"percent":50},104,"104",{"value":128,"display":129,"percent":130},4,"4.0 GHz",66,{"value":132,"display":133,"percent":50},300,"300 MB",{"value":132,"display":135,"percent":21},"300 W",[137,139,140,141,142,144],{"key":66,"label":67,"value":138},"FCLGA4677",{"key":70,"label":71,"value":133},{"key":73,"label":74,"value":129},{"key":76,"label":77,"value":135},{"key":79,"label":80,"value":143},"DDR5 @ 4800 MT\u002Fs (1 DPC)",{"key":83,"label":84,"value":145},"Q4'23",{"gaming_index":147,"content_creation_index":148,"compute_index":149,"ai_index":150,"efficiency_index":151,"value_index":152,"g_score":153,"breakdown":154},175.2,96.31,94.88,92.44,87.1,24.97,101.9,{"gaming":155,"content_creation":158,"compute":160,"ai":162,"efficiency":164,"value":167},{"single_core":156,"cache_factor":157,"frequency_factor":20},72,2.36,{"compute":149,"memory":159,"sustained_power":50},94,{"architecture":57,"parallel":50,"frequency":161,"sustained_power":50},66.67,{"instruction":50,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":163,"memory":50},86.25,{"performance_index":165,"effective_power":132,"performance_efficiency":151,"power_feature":166,"platform_efficiency":151},108.5,75.82,{"capability":168,"resource_cost":169,"core_cost":170,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":171},245.15,956,520,20,{"template_seed":173,"winner_g_score":93,"loser_g_score":153,"g_score_delta_percent":174,"top_scenario_id":175,"top_scenario_delta_percent":128,"winner_lead_count":128,"is_close_call":176},38826,12,"compute",false,[178,180,182,183,185,187],{"id":179,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":87,"scoreB":147,"advice":9},"gaming",{"id":181,"winnerSlug":113,"scoreA":88,"scoreB":148,"advice":9},"contentCreation",{"id":175,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":89,"scoreB":149,"advice":9},{"id":184,"winnerSlug":113,"scoreA":90,"scoreB":150,"advice":9},"ai",{"id":186,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":91,"scoreB":151,"advice":9},"efficiency",{"id":188,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":92,"scoreB":152,"advice":9},"value",[190,195,199,201,204,205,207],{"key":191,"label":192,"valueA":193,"valueB":193,"winner":194},"hw_type","硬件类型","CPU","tie",{"key":196,"label":197,"valueA":49,"valueB":123,"winner":198},"cores","核心 \u002F 线程","a",{"key":73,"label":200,"valueA":56,"valueB":129,"winner":198},"最高 Boost",{"key":70,"label":202,"valueA":60,"valueB":133,"winner":203},"L3 缓存","b",{"key":76,"label":77,"valueA":63,"valueB":135,"winner":198},{"key":66,"label":206,"valueA":68,"valueB":138,"winner":194},"平台",{"key":79,"label":208,"valueA":81,"valueB":143,"winner":203},"内存支持",[210,211,213],{"id":179,"winner_slug":39,"delta_percent":20},{"id":181,"winner_slug":113,"delta_percent":212},11,{"id":214,"winner_slug":39,"delta_percent":174},"overall",[216,237],{"page":42,"isCompared":217,"list":218},true,[219,224,229,233],{"slug":220,"type":220,"question":221,"answer":222,"page":42,"heat":223},"motherboard","给 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;PRO 5995WX 使用 WRX80 板：sWRX8，八通道 DDR4 ECC RDIMM。二手 WRX80 板来源差异大，需确认 BIOS 支持、是否存在暗病与保修情况。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;内存插满八通道或对称安装。DDR4 低价是成本优势，但老平台不宜过多投入。\u003C\u002Fp>",184,{"slug":225,"type":225,"question":226,"answer":227,"page":42,"heat":228},"cooling","Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;满载功耗高（接近 300W），360 水冷是底线，风道要好。扣具确认 sWRX8 兼容。全核 10 分钟功耗频率稳定才合格。\u003C\u002Fp>",176,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":230,"answer":231,"page":42,"heat":232},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 能打游戏吗？买来当游戏机合不合适？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 是 64 核 128 线程的 WRX80 工作站处理器。能跑，但 64 核游戏机的性价比是负的：游戏用不上，单核 Zen3 不占优，平台成本还高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是干活机器，游戏只是随赠品。纯游戏党请直接划走。\u003C\u002Fp>",169,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":234,"answer":235,"page":42,"heat":236},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 是多少核、多少线程？适合什么场景，不适合什么场景？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;5995WX 是 64 核 128 线程，Zen3 时代的 WRX80 工作站顶配。64 核渲染、仿真、编译是它的天下，八通道 DDR4 内存带宽充足。放今天它的多核依然猛，二手价理性，是\"旧旗舰捡漏\"的好例子。但只适合软件能吃满 64 核的用户。\u003C\u002Fp>",166,{"page":116,"isCompared":217,"list":238},[239],{"slug":184,"type":184,"question":240,"answer":241,"page":116,"heat":242},"给机柜选 8571N 这种 52 核款铺 AI 推理节点，赌的是容量还是能效？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;该赌能效。单看一颗，52 核 104 线程不算出挑，可机房的账按总量算：机器一多，总吞吐由核数加总而来，单颗少点峰值，换来的是电费和机位更宽裕。4GHz 睿频和 AMX 让它跑批量推理不掉队，8 通道最高 4096GB 也够单节点驻留；机位就是租金，能效越高，同样的机柜能多塞的节点越多。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;电费机位双紧、又要铺一片推理或数据面节点的，它把单机成本压得很低，下限给得足；指望单颗在延迟上惊艳的采购，方向反了。铺量前先用几十台做调度与网络压测，别让第一批货替你交学费。\u003C\u002Fp>",132,[244,249,254,259,264,269,273,278,282,286,291,296,300,305,310,314,320,324,328,333],{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":245,"answer":246,"page":247,"heat":248},"用 Core Ultra 5 325 装机打游戏，1080p、2K、4K 怎么配显卡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程打游戏完全够，瓶颈几乎永远在显卡。1080p 高刷配 RTX 5060\u002F5070 级别，2K 配 5070 Ti 或 RX 9070 XT 级别，4K 就把预算全给显卡和显存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;一句话：预算往显卡倾斜，CPU 选它不会成为短板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-325",437,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":250,"answer":251,"page":252,"heat":253},"Core Ultra 7 356H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程，H 后缀代表高性能移动平台。游戏的 1080p 高刷看单核和独显 TGP，2K\u002F4K 通常看 GPU；编译、编码、剪辑和 CPU 渲染可利用 16 条线程，但长时间性能必须核对 CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式和共享散热。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;具体机型的 10 至 15 分钟功耗\u002F频率日志比峰值睿频更能说明它是否适合长任务。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-356h",388,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":255,"answer":256,"page":257,"heat":258},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225U 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225U 只有 2 个 P 核，单核性能可应付网游但无法支撑 3A 大作；核显较弱，1080p 低画质下 LOL、CS2 勉强流畅。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它面向长续航办公场景，游戏不是设计重点。以游戏为主要需求，H 系列独显本更合适。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225u",385,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":260,"answer":261,"page":262,"heat":263},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 5 225H 是 14 核 14 线程的标压 H 系，配主流独显打游戏完全够格，帧数卡不卡看两件事：独显型号+实际 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost），以及这台机的 CPU 持续包功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;1080p 高刷或电竞游戏对 CPU 帧时间敏感，2K\u002F4K 基本由 GPU 决定。想验证瓶颈，插电开性能模式，用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟游戏：GPU 利用率接近 95% 且功耗贴近 TGP，就是显卡限制；GPU 利用率上不去（低于约 90%）而 CPU 有线程饱和，则检查 CPU 功耗墙、散热和性能模式。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225h",380,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":265,"answer":266,"page":267,"heat":268},"Core Ultra 7 255H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 16 线程，注意 Arrow Lake 移动版同样没有超线程。游戏、开发、中度剪辑按这个规模看是够的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;大型编译和长视频导出能吃满全部线程，但笔记本能不能一直保持这个性能，取决于整机功耗墙、独显 TGP 和散热，光看型号没意义。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255h",376,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":270,"answer":271,"page":262,"heat":272},"Core Ultra 5 225H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14 核 14 线程（4 性能核 + 8 能效核 + 2 低功耗核），性能核基频 1.7GHz、睿频 4.9GHz，L3 缓存 18MB，Arrow Lake 平台，2025 年 Q1 发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225H 和 235H 同架构，只是基频低一些，日常体验几乎无差别；14 线程在游戏、开发、剪辑里都够，持续重负载受笔记本功耗墙限制。这个档位选机器看价格和模具散热就行。\u003C\u002Fp>",374,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":274,"answer":275,"page":276,"heat":277},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 24 核 24 线程的 HX 处理器。游戏性能主要看显卡和模具，255HX 不是瓶颈：两台机摆一起，一台上 4060 满功耗加独显直连，一台上 4070 但 80W 锁功耗还没直连，前者游戏体验可能更好。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;选 255HX 游戏本：显卡 TGP、MUX、性能模式功耗，三样确认完再比价。CPU 型号本身不用纠结。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255hx",373,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":279,"answer":280,"page":276,"heat":281},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 20 核 20 线程（8 性能核 + 12 能效核，无超线程），Arrow Lake，基础 2.4GHz、最高 5.2GHz，L3 30MB。它和 265HX 是同一颗硅片的两个频率档位，规格几乎一样，265HX 只是睿频略高 0.1GHz，实际跑游戏、剪视频、编译的差距都在 3% 以内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;所以选机器时这两个型号不值得纠结，同一模具下的 255HX 和 265HX 用起来几乎没有区别。真正决定这台 HX 本性能上限的是整机的功耗释放和散热设计，同样是 20 核 20 线程，给 60W 和给 150W 是两台不同的电脑。\u003C\u002Fp>",370,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":283,"answer":284,"page":267,"heat":285},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255H 游戏本先看独显 TGP 和 CPU 持续功耗，16 核 16 线程只是其次。1080p 高刷更吃 CPU 内存，2K\u002F4K 先看显卡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;买之前核对 TGP、插电后两种模式下的实际功耗、有没有独显直连。同名显卡 TGP 差一截，比处理器型号更能改变游戏结果。\u003C\u002Fp>",369,{"slug":225,"type":225,"question":287,"answer":288,"page":289,"heat":290},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏 270K Plus 用高规格双塔或 240\u002F280 水冷。解除功耗限制后持续全核编译编码渲染超 180W，就上顶级双塔或 360 水冷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跑 15-20 分钟全核看包功耗、频率和 VRM 状态，掉得明显就降功耗或升级散热。确认 LGA1851 扣具和机箱排热。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-270k-plus",366,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":292,"answer":293,"page":294,"heat":295},"Core i7 14650HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 24 线程的 HX 移动 U，游戏本常见配置。这规格的“够不够”关键在整机能不能一直喂饱，而不只是参数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;办公、多任务按规格判断就行；编码、渲染得看具体机型。14 代 HX 记得更新 BIOS 微码。同样的 U，厚机本比轻薄本强得多。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i7-14650hx",363,{"slug":220,"type":220,"question":297,"answer":298,"page":289,"heat":299},"给 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;270K Plus 使用 LGA1851、800 系列芯片组与 DDR5。超频选 Z890，默认使用选供电扎实的 B860，H810 难以承载 24 核高功耗持续负载。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;核对 BIOS 与 CPU 支持表，再按显卡、M.2、USB、网卡与 VRM 散热取舍。长期编译渲染的预算优先给供电与散热，而非装饰性接口。\u003C\u002Fp>",348,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":301,"answer":302,"page":303,"heat":304},"Core i5 14400F 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14400F 配中端独显很合适：1080p 高刷更看 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K\u002F4K 基本是显卡决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跟便宜型号比，锁同一显卡、内存、驱动和功耗设置，再看同场景的 1% low。如果你还要边玩边直播、录制或编译，注意 CPU 会不会长期满载，多线程负载比单纯打游戏更早碰到功耗和散热天花板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14400f",341,{"slug":306,"type":306,"question":307,"answer":308,"page":276,"heat":309},"power","Core Ultra 7 255HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 的功耗模式实测方法照旧：性能模式全核 10 分钟，看 Package Power 和 GPU 功耗分配。这代 HX 的功耗策略整体不错，但机身散热仍是天花板。插电打游戏或渲染开性能模式，风扇噪音大点就大点；离电办公平衡模式，续航更重要。\u003C\u002Fp>",338,{"slug":306,"type":306,"question":311,"answer":312,"page":294,"heat":313},"Core i7 14650HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;短时间使用的话，性能模式的意义不大，那是给持续满载任务准备的。14650HX 的额定功耗不是实际功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;开不开性能模式，看任务时长、噪声和散热余量。短任务用平衡就够，风扇也安静不少。\u003C\u002Fp>",337,{"slug":315,"type":316,"question":317,"answer":318,"page":276,"heat":319},"battery","general","搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 平台轻办公约 5 小时，游戏必须插电。离电省电就三样：混合显卡、60Hz、平衡模式。后台软件和屏幕亮度对续航的影响比 CPU 型号大，对比两台机器先把这些条件对齐。想要长续航，选轻薄本，不是 HX 本。\u003C\u002Fp>",336,{"slug":315,"type":316,"question":321,"answer":322,"page":294,"heat":323},"搭载 Core i7 14650HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;续航是整机指标：电池容量、屏幕和低负载功耗决定办公续航，独显功耗和插电条件决定游戏体验。14650HX 无法单独推算出小时数。HX 机型不插电游戏基本不现实，办公续航重点看电池 Wh 和混合显卡设置。\u003C\u002Fp>",326,{"slug":179,"type":179,"question":325,"answer":326,"page":289,"heat":327},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 24 核 24 线程（Arrow Lake 无超线程）的桌面处理器。1080p 高刷吃 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K 是 CPU\u002FGPU 平衡，4K 基本看显卡；24 核更适合边编译、边直播、边渲染的用法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;对比便宜型号时固定显卡、内存、驱动和 BIOS 功耗，测同场景帧时间。核心数不能替代实测，别据此报帧数。游戏场景它的性价比一般，生产力才是主场。\u003C\u002Fp>",320,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":329,"answer":330,"page":331,"heat":332},"Core i5 14600KF 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14600KF 是 14 核 20 线程（6 性能核 + 8 能效核），无核显，是 2023 年的甜点 i5。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏和轻度生产力通吃，20 线程渲染编译也够。KF 无核显必须配独显，价格比 14600K 便宜一点点。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14600kf",317,{"slug":196,"type":196,"question":334,"answer":335,"page":247,"heat":336},"Core Ultra 5 325 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程（无超线程），LGA1851 平台的中端桌面 U。对绝大多数人，游戏+办公+轻中度生产力都在舒适区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是今年 Intel 主流装机里性价比不错的选项，比带超线程的高端款便宜不少，游戏差距却不大。\u003C\u002Fp>",315,[338,342,345,351,354,358,362,366,370,373,375,379,383,387,389,393,396,399,403,406],{"slug_a":339,"slug_b":340,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":341},"core-i7-13645hx","core-i7-13700hx",131,{"slug_a":343,"slug_b":344,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":96},"ryzen-threadripper-pro-3955wx","xeon-platinum-9282",{"slug_a":346,"slug_b":347,"name_a":348,"name_b":349,"i_heat":350},"core-i5-12490f","core-i5-13600kf","Intel® Core™ i5-12490F Processor","Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor",76,{"slug_a":352,"slug_b":353,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":57},"core-ultra-9-275hx","core-ultra-9-290hx-plus",{"slug_a":355,"slug_b":356,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":357},"core-i5-1340pe","core-i5-13600h",71,{"slug_a":359,"slug_b":360,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":361},"core-i7-14650hx","core-ultra-7-251hx",69,{"slug_a":363,"slug_b":364,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":365},"core-i5-13600t","core-ultra-5-245hx",65,{"slug_a":367,"slug_b":368,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":369},"core-ultra-7-255h","core-ultra-7-356h",57,{"slug_a":371,"slug_b":372,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":122},"ryzen-9-8945hx","ryzen-9-9955hx",{"slug_a":360,"slug_b":374,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":122},"core-ultra-7-255hx",{"slug_a":376,"slug_b":377,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":378},"core-m-5y71","ryzen-ai-5-340",50,{"slug_a":380,"slug_b":381,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":382},"core-i5-14400f","core-i5-14490f",48,{"slug_a":384,"slug_b":385,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":386},"core-i3-1215ue","core-i3-12300he",47,{"slug_a":374,"slug_b":368,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":388},46,{"slug_a":390,"slug_b":391,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":392},"core-i5-14600kf","core-ultra-5-250k-plus",44,{"slug_a":394,"slug_b":395,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":392},"core-ultra-5-225h","core-ultra-5-235h",{"slug_a":397,"slug_b":353,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":398},"core-i9-13900hx",43,{"slug_a":400,"slug_b":401,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":402},"core-i9-10980xe-extreme-edition","ryzen-9-pro-9965",42,{"slug_a":395,"slug_b":404,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":405},"core-ultra-5-235hx",41,{"slug_a":407,"slug_b":408,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":405},"core-ultra-7-265k","core-ultra-7-270k-plus"]