[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"home:siteConfig":3,"decision-compare:brand":17,"decision-compare:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568ya":36,"decision-compare:faq:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568ya":216,"decision-compare:faq-hot:zh":244,"decision-compare:related-list:zh:ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx-vs-xeon-platinum-8568ya":338},{"code":4,"data":5,"msg":16},1000,{"s_title":6,"s_slogan":7,"s_description":8,"s_keywords":9,"s_logo_url":10,"s_favicon_url":11,"s_og_image_url":12,"s_site_url":13,"s_og_title":6,"s_og_description":8,"s_icp":14,"s_gongan_icp":9,"s_copyright":15},"极库","极客装机，酷无止境","极库（GeeCool）是 DIY 硬件社区，分享装机作品、发现装机灵感，探索 CPU、显卡、内存等硬件信息，与极客玩家一起交流。","","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Flogo\u002F852e2056-6a54-4c8c-ab3a-b423075227df.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Ffavicon\u002F8a8d0f4e-a624-4a59-a38f-502c1e017480.ico","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fsite\u002Fog\u002F28d69746-a0ef-4aa0-825f-38d9562c3a57.png","https:\u002F\u002Fwww.geecool.net","蜀ICP备2024109955号-2","© 2026 GeeCool. All rights reserved.","成功",{"code":4,"data":18,"msg":16},[19,26,31],{"id":20,"sort":21,"s_name":22,"s_identifier":23,"s_icon_url":24,"s_wide_image_url":25},1,0,"Intel","INTEL","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F7a8f0d43-aa34-4ae6-b527-5e4dd4406b3a.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F5fa18192-e149-4a29-b005-d8fb84fb6d6c.png",{"id":27,"sort":21,"s_name":28,"s_identifier":29,"s_icon_url":30,"s_wide_image_url":9},3,"Nvidia","NVIDIA","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002F36e9735e-c4fd-4e81-9f8e-7be5e8b28ef1.png",{"id":32,"sort":20,"s_name":33,"s_identifier":33,"s_icon_url":34,"s_wide_image_url":35},2,"AMD","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Ficon\u002Fcb1f17f9-d291-4f7c-b323-799f5f66976c.png","https:\u002F\u002Fcdn.geecool.net\u002Fconfig\u002Fbrand\u002Fwide\u002F32656cc6-804f-45ae-9d66-7953b3f40855.png",{"cpuA":37,"cpuB":111,"winnerSlug":39,"recommendation":173,"scenarios":178,"diffRows":190,"faq":210},{"id":38,"slug":39,"name":40,"brand":41,"gee_cool_page":42,"intro":43,"features":44,"metrics":46,"highlights":64,"scores":86},"Bhx6pEqzbF8bcCx4aDHyow","ryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx","AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5995WX","amd","\u002Fcpu\u002Famd\u002Fryzen-threadripper-pro-5995wx","Get drivers and downloads for the latest version of AMD Ryzen™ Threadripper™ PRO 5995WX",[45],"large_cache",{"cores":47,"threads":51,"boost":54,"cache":58,"tdp":61},{"value":48,"display":49,"percent":50},64,"64 \u002F 128",100,{"value":52,"display":53,"percent":50},128,"128",{"value":55,"display":56,"percent":57},4.5,"4.5 GHz",75,{"value":59,"display":60,"percent":50},256,"256 MB",{"value":62,"display":63,"percent":21},280,"280 W",[65,69,72,75,78,82],{"key":66,"label":67,"value":68},"socket","插槽","sWRX8",{"key":70,"label":71,"value":60},"cache","三级缓存",{"key":73,"label":74,"value":56},"boost","最高频率",{"key":76,"label":77,"value":63},"tdp","TDP",{"key":79,"label":80,"value":81},"memory","内存","DDR4",{"key":83,"label":84,"value":85},"launch","上市","03\u002F08\u002F2022",{"gaming_index":87,"content_creation_index":88,"compute_index":89,"ai_index":90,"efficiency_index":91,"value_index":92,"g_score":93,"breakdown":94},177.98,86.58,98.95,52.24,218.5,25.52,114.16,{"gaming":95,"content_creation":98,"compute":100,"ai":102,"efficiency":104,"value":106},{"single_core":96,"cache_factor":97,"frequency_factor":20},81,2.13,{"compute":89,"memory":99,"sustained_power":50},36,{"architecture":101,"parallel":50,"frequency":57,"sustained_power":50},82,{"instruction":21,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":103,"memory":57},74.52,{"performance_index":105,"effective_power":62,"performance_efficiency":91,"power_feature":91,"platform_efficiency":91},282.65,{"capability":107,"resource_cost":108,"core_cost":109,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":110},282.7,1162,640,10,{"id":112,"slug":113,"name":114,"brand":115,"gee_cool_page":116,"intro":117,"features":118,"metrics":120,"highlights":137,"scores":147},"9wiGwtQDpIgmu1PyR9lWQg","xeon-platinum-8568ya","Intel® Xeon® Platinum 8568YA+ Processor","intel","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fxeon-platinum-8568ya","300M Cache, 2.30 GHz",[45,119],"amx",{"cores":121,"threads":124,"boost":127,"cache":131,"tdp":134},{"value":122,"display":123,"percent":50},48,"48 \u002F 96",{"value":125,"display":126,"percent":50},96,"96",{"value":128,"display":129,"percent":130},4,"4.0 GHz",66,{"value":132,"display":133,"percent":50},300,"300 MB",{"value":135,"display":136,"percent":21},350,"350 W",[138,140,141,142,143,145],{"key":66,"label":67,"value":139},"FCLGA4677",{"key":70,"label":71,"value":133},{"key":73,"label":74,"value":129},{"key":76,"label":77,"value":136},{"key":79,"label":80,"value":144},"DDR5 @ 5600 MT\u002Fs (1 DPC)",{"key":83,"label":84,"value":146},"Q2'26",{"gaming_index":148,"content_creation_index":149,"compute_index":150,"ai_index":151,"efficiency_index":152,"value_index":153,"g_score":154,"breakdown":155},175.2,96.31,94.88,92.44,80.95,25.5,101.28,{"gaming":156,"content_creation":159,"compute":161,"ai":163,"efficiency":165,"value":168},{"single_core":157,"cache_factor":158,"frequency_factor":20},72,2.36,{"compute":150,"memory":160,"sustained_power":50},94,{"architecture":57,"parallel":50,"frequency":162,"sustained_power":50},66.67,{"instruction":50,"ai_acceleration":21,"compute":164,"memory":50},86.25,{"performance_index":166,"effective_power":135,"performance_efficiency":152,"power_feature":167,"platform_efficiency":152},104,70.47,{"capability":169,"resource_cost":170,"core_cost":171,"power_cost":21,"platform_cost":172},231.15,884,480,20,{"template_seed":174,"winner_g_score":93,"loser_g_score":154,"g_score_delta_percent":175,"top_scenario_id":176,"top_scenario_delta_percent":128,"winner_lead_count":128,"is_close_call":177},95919,12,"compute",false,[179,181,183,184,186,188],{"id":180,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":87,"scoreB":148,"advice":9},"gaming",{"id":182,"winnerSlug":113,"scoreA":88,"scoreB":149,"advice":9},"contentCreation",{"id":176,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":89,"scoreB":150,"advice":9},{"id":185,"winnerSlug":113,"scoreA":90,"scoreB":151,"advice":9},"ai",{"id":187,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":91,"scoreB":152,"advice":9},"efficiency",{"id":189,"winnerSlug":39,"scoreA":92,"scoreB":153,"advice":9},"value",[191,196,200,202,205,206,208],{"key":192,"label":193,"valueA":194,"valueB":194,"winner":195},"hw_type","硬件类型","CPU","tie",{"key":197,"label":198,"valueA":49,"valueB":123,"winner":199},"cores","核心 \u002F 线程","a",{"key":73,"label":201,"valueA":56,"valueB":129,"winner":199},"最高 Boost",{"key":70,"label":203,"valueA":60,"valueB":133,"winner":204},"L3 缓存","b",{"key":76,"label":77,"valueA":63,"valueB":136,"winner":199},{"key":66,"label":207,"valueA":68,"valueB":139,"winner":195},"平台",{"key":79,"label":209,"valueA":81,"valueB":144,"winner":204},"内存支持",[211,212,214],{"id":180,"winner_slug":39,"delta_percent":20},{"id":182,"winner_slug":113,"delta_percent":213},11,{"id":215,"winner_slug":39,"delta_percent":175},"overall",[217,238],{"page":42,"isCompared":218,"list":219},true,[220,225,230,234],{"slug":221,"type":221,"question":222,"answer":223,"page":42,"heat":224},"motherboard","给 Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;PRO 5995WX 使用 WRX80 板：sWRX8，八通道 DDR4 ECC RDIMM。二手 WRX80 板来源差异大，需确认 BIOS 支持、是否存在暗病与保修情况。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;内存插满八通道或对称安装。DDR4 低价是成本优势，但老平台不宜过多投入。\u003C\u002Fp>",184,{"slug":226,"type":226,"question":227,"answer":228,"page":42,"heat":229},"cooling","Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;满载功耗高（接近 300W），360 水冷是底线，风道要好。扣具确认 sWRX8 兼容。全核 10 分钟功耗频率稳定才合格。\u003C\u002Fp>",176,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":231,"answer":232,"page":42,"heat":233},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 能打游戏吗？买来当游戏机合不合适？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 是 64 核 128 线程的 WRX80 工作站处理器。能跑，但 64 核游戏机的性价比是负的：游戏用不上，单核 Zen3 不占优，平台成本还高。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是干活机器，游戏只是随赠品。纯游戏党请直接划走。\u003C\u002Fp>",169,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":235,"answer":236,"page":42,"heat":237},"Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX 是多少核、多少线程？适合什么场景，不适合什么场景？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;5995WX 是 64 核 128 线程，Zen3 时代的 WRX80 工作站顶配。64 核渲染、仿真、编译是它的天下，八通道 DDR4 内存带宽充足。放今天它的多核依然猛，二手价理性，是\"旧旗舰捡漏\"的好例子。但只适合软件能吃满 64 核的用户。\u003C\u002Fp>",166,{"page":116,"isCompared":218,"list":239},[240],{"slug":185,"type":185,"question":241,"answer":242,"page":116,"heat":243},"单路 48 核喂不饱 AI 吞吐时上双路，两颗 Xeon Platinum 8568YA+ 翻出 96 核，比硬等单颗更大核数划算在哪儿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;划算在两段式投入。一颗 8568YA+ 就是 48 核 96 线程，配好内存与 300MB L3，AI 数据面加推理并行已经铺得开；吞吐真不够了再加第二颗，直接翻倍，单核 4GHz 的体验全程不变。比起一次买足大核数旗舰，这条路让预算跟着真实负载走。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;规模还没定、又确定要进机架的团队，双路方案留足了余量；机位和供电只够单路的机房，买双路款等于让一半插槽吃灰。下单前按 96 线程把每路内存配齐，别让第二颗 CPU 等第一颗的数据。\u003C\u002Fp>",127,[245,250,255,260,265,270,274,279,283,287,292,297,301,306,311,315,321,325,329,334],{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":246,"answer":247,"page":248,"heat":249},"用 Core Ultra 5 325 装机打游戏，1080p、2K、4K 怎么配显卡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程打游戏完全够，瓶颈几乎永远在显卡。1080p 高刷配 RTX 5060\u002F5070 级别，2K 配 5070 Ti 或 RX 9070 XT 级别，4K 就把预算全给显卡和显存。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;一句话：预算往显卡倾斜，CPU 选它不会成为短板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-325",437,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":251,"answer":252,"page":253,"heat":254},"Core Ultra 7 356H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 356H 是 16 核 16 线程，H 后缀代表高性能移动平台。游戏的 1080p 高刷看单核和独显 TGP，2K\u002F4K 通常看 GPU；编译、编码、剪辑和 CPU 渲染可利用 16 条线程，但长时间性能必须核对 CPU 持续包功耗、性能模式和共享散热。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;具体机型的 10 至 15 分钟功耗\u002F频率日志比峰值睿频更能说明它是否适合长任务。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-356h",388,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":256,"answer":257,"page":258,"heat":259},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225U 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225U 只有 2 个 P 核，单核性能可应付网游但无法支撑 3A 大作；核显较弱，1080p 低画质下 LOL、CS2 勉强流畅。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它面向长续航办公场景，游戏不是设计重点。以游戏为主要需求，H 系列独显本更合适。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225u",385,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":261,"answer":262,"page":263,"heat":264},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 5 225H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 5 225H 是 14 核 14 线程的标压 H 系，配主流独显打游戏完全够格，帧数卡不卡看两件事：独显型号+实际 TGP（含 Dynamic Boost），以及这台机的 CPU 持续包功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;1080p 高刷或电竞游戏对 CPU 帧时间敏感，2K\u002F4K 基本由 GPU 决定。想验证瓶颈，插电开性能模式，用 HWiNFO 记录 15 分钟游戏：GPU 利用率接近 95% 且功耗贴近 TGP，就是显卡限制；GPU 利用率上不去（低于约 90%）而 CPU 有线程饱和，则检查 CPU 功耗墙、散热和性能模式。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-5-225h",380,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":266,"answer":267,"page":268,"heat":269},"Core Ultra 7 255H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 16 线程，注意 Arrow Lake 移动版同样没有超线程。游戏、开发、中度剪辑按这个规模看是够的。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;大型编译和长视频导出能吃满全部线程，但笔记本能不能一直保持这个性能，取决于整机功耗墙、独显 TGP 和散热，光看型号没意义。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255h",376,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":271,"answer":272,"page":263,"heat":273},"Core Ultra 5 225H 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14 核 14 线程（4 性能核 + 8 能效核 + 2 低功耗核），性能核基频 1.7GHz、睿频 4.9GHz，L3 缓存 18MB，Arrow Lake 平台，2025 年 Q1 发布。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;225H 和 235H 同架构，只是基频低一些，日常体验几乎无差别；14 线程在游戏、开发、剪辑里都够，持续重负载受笔记本功耗墙限制。这个档位选机器看价格和模具散热就行。\u003C\u002Fp>",374,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":275,"answer":276,"page":277,"heat":278},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 24 核 24 线程的 HX 处理器。游戏性能主要看显卡和模具，255HX 不是瓶颈：两台机摆一起，一台上 4060 满功耗加独显直连，一台上 4070 但 80W 锁功耗还没直连，前者游戏体验可能更好。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;选 255HX 游戏本：显卡 TGP、MUX、性能模式功耗，三样确认完再比价。CPU 型号本身不用纠结。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-255hx",373,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":280,"answer":281,"page":277,"heat":282},"Core Ultra 7 255HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 255HX 是 20 核 20 线程（8 性能核 + 12 能效核，无超线程），Arrow Lake，基础 2.4GHz、最高 5.2GHz，L3 30MB。它和 265HX 是同一颗硅片的两个频率档位，规格几乎一样，265HX 只是睿频略高 0.1GHz，实际跑游戏、剪视频、编译的差距都在 3% 以内。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;所以选机器时这两个型号不值得纠结，同一模具下的 255HX 和 265HX 用起来几乎没有区别。真正决定这台 HX 本性能上限的是整机的功耗释放和散热设计，同样是 20 核 20 线程，给 60W 和给 150W 是两台不同的电脑。\u003C\u002Fp>",370,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":284,"answer":285,"page":268,"heat":286},"笔记本搭载 Core Ultra 7 255H 打游戏够不够？CPU 还是显卡更关键？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255H 游戏本先看独显 TGP 和 CPU 持续功耗，16 核 16 线程只是其次。1080p 高刷更吃 CPU 内存，2K\u002F4K 先看显卡。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;买之前核对 TGP、插电后两种模式下的实际功耗、有没有独显直连。同名显卡 TGP 差一截，比处理器型号更能改变游戏结果。\u003C\u002Fp>",369,{"slug":226,"type":226,"question":288,"answer":289,"page":290,"heat":291},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 需要多大散热器？打游戏和全核跑满有什么区别？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏 270K Plus 用高规格双塔或 240\u002F280 水冷。解除功耗限制后持续全核编译编码渲染超 180W，就上顶级双塔或 360 水冷。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跑 15-20 分钟全核看包功耗、频率和 VRM 状态，掉得明显就降功耗或升级散热。确认 LGA1851 扣具和机箱排热。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-ultra-7-270k-plus",366,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":293,"answer":294,"page":295,"heat":296},"Core i7 14650HX 几核几线程？打游戏、剪视频会不会拖后腿？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;16 核 24 线程的 HX 移动 U，游戏本常见配置。这规格的“够不够”关键在整机能不能一直喂饱，而不只是参数。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;办公、多任务按规格判断就行；编码、渲染得看具体机型。14 代 HX 记得更新 BIOS 微码。同样的 U，厚机本比轻薄本强得多。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i7-14650hx",363,{"slug":221,"type":221,"question":298,"answer":299,"page":290,"heat":300},"给 Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 配什么主板合适？供电、内存、接口怎么平衡？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;270K Plus 使用 LGA1851、800 系列芯片组与 DDR5。超频选 Z890，默认使用选供电扎实的 B860，H810 难以承载 24 核高功耗持续负载。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;核对 BIOS 与 CPU 支持表，再按显卡、M.2、USB、网卡与 VRM 散热取舍。长期编译渲染的预算优先给供电与散热，而非装饰性接口。\u003C\u002Fp>",348,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":302,"answer":303,"page":304,"heat":305},"Core i5 14400F 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14400F 配中端独显很合适：1080p 高刷更看 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K\u002F4K 基本是显卡决定。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;跟便宜型号比，锁同一显卡、内存、驱动和功耗设置，再看同场景的 1% low。如果你还要边玩边直播、录制或编译，注意 CPU 会不会长期满载，多线程负载比单纯打游戏更早碰到功耗和散热天花板。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14400f",341,{"slug":307,"type":307,"question":308,"answer":309,"page":277,"heat":310},"power","Core Ultra 7 255HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 的功耗模式实测方法照旧：性能模式全核 10 分钟，看 Package Power 和 GPU 功耗分配。这代 HX 的功耗策略整体不错，但机身散热仍是天花板。插电打游戏或渲染开性能模式，风扇噪音大点就大点；离电办公平衡模式，续航更重要。\u003C\u002Fp>",338,{"slug":307,"type":307,"question":312,"answer":313,"page":295,"heat":314},"Core i7 14650HX 在不同功耗模式下性能差多少？什么时候该开性能模式？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;短时间使用的话，性能模式的意义不大，那是给持续满载任务准备的。14650HX 的额定功耗不是实际功耗。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;开不开性能模式，看任务时长、噪声和散热余量。短任务用平衡就够，风扇也安静不少。\u003C\u002Fp>",337,{"slug":316,"type":317,"question":318,"answer":319,"page":277,"heat":320},"battery","general","搭载 Core Ultra 7 255HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;255HX 平台轻办公约 5 小时，游戏必须插电。离电省电就三样：混合显卡、60Hz、平衡模式。后台软件和屏幕亮度对续航的影响比 CPU 型号大，对比两台机器先把这些条件对齐。想要长续航，选轻薄本，不是 HX 本。\u003C\u002Fp>",336,{"slug":316,"type":317,"question":322,"answer":323,"page":295,"heat":324},"搭载 Core i7 14650HX 的笔记本能用多久？不插电办公和打游戏分别能撑多久？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;续航是整机指标：电池容量、屏幕和低负载功耗决定办公续航，独显功耗和插电条件决定游戏体验。14650HX 无法单独推算出小时数。HX 机型不插电游戏基本不现实，办公续航重点看电池 Wh 和混合显卡设置。\u003C\u002Fp>",326,{"slug":180,"type":180,"question":326,"answer":327,"page":290,"heat":328},"Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 打游戏表现怎么样？和便宜型号差距大吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;Core Ultra 7 270K Plus 是 24 核 24 线程（Arrow Lake 无超线程）的桌面处理器。1080p 高刷吃 CPU 单核、内存和引擎，2K 是 CPU\u002FGPU 平衡，4K 基本看显卡；24 核更适合边编译、边直播、边渲染的用法。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;对比便宜型号时固定显卡、内存、驱动和 BIOS 功耗，测同场景帧时间。核心数不能替代实测，别据此报帧数。游戏场景它的性价比一般，生产力才是主场。\u003C\u002Fp>",320,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":330,"answer":331,"page":332,"heat":333},"Core i5 14600KF 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;14600KF 是 14 核 20 线程（6 性能核 + 8 能效核），无核显，是 2023 年的甜点 i5。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;游戏和轻度生产力通吃，20 线程渲染编译也够。KF 无核显必须配独显，价格比 14600K 便宜一点点。\u003C\u002Fp>","\u002Fcpu\u002Fintel\u002Fcore-i5-14600kf",317,{"slug":197,"type":197,"question":335,"answer":336,"page":248,"heat":337},"Core Ultra 5 325 是多少核多少线程？打游戏和干活分别够用吗？","\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;8 核 8 线程（无超线程），LGA1851 平台的中端桌面 U。对绝大多数人，游戏+办公+轻中度生产力都在舒适区。\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp style=\"margin:0 0 4px;line-height:1.5;\">&nbsp;&nbsp;它是今年 Intel 主流装机里性价比不错的选项，比带超线程的高端款便宜不少，游戏差距却不大。\u003C\u002Fp>",315,[339,343,346,352,355,359,363,367,371,375,377,381,384,388,390,394,397,400,404,407],{"slug_a":340,"slug_b":341,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":342},"core-i7-13645hx","core-i7-13700hx",131,{"slug_a":344,"slug_b":345,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":96},"ryzen-threadripper-pro-3955wx","xeon-platinum-9282",{"slug_a":347,"slug_b":348,"name_a":349,"name_b":350,"i_heat":351},"core-i5-12490f","core-i5-13600kf","Intel® Core™ i5-12490F Processor","Intel® Core™ i5-13600KF Processor",76,{"slug_a":353,"slug_b":354,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":57},"core-ultra-9-275hx","core-ultra-9-290hx-plus",{"slug_a":356,"slug_b":357,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":358},"core-i5-1340pe","core-i5-13600h",71,{"slug_a":360,"slug_b":361,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":362},"core-i7-14650hx","core-ultra-7-251hx",69,{"slug_a":364,"slug_b":365,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":366},"core-i5-13600t","core-ultra-5-245hx",65,{"slug_a":368,"slug_b":369,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":370},"core-ultra-7-255h","core-ultra-7-356h",57,{"slug_a":372,"slug_b":373,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":374},"ryzen-9-8945hx","ryzen-9-9955hx",52,{"slug_a":361,"slug_b":376,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":374},"core-ultra-7-255hx",{"slug_a":378,"slug_b":379,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":380},"core-m-5y71","ryzen-ai-5-340",50,{"slug_a":382,"slug_b":383,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":122},"core-i5-14400f","core-i5-14490f",{"slug_a":385,"slug_b":386,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":387},"core-i3-1215ue","core-i3-12300he",47,{"slug_a":376,"slug_b":369,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":389},46,{"slug_a":391,"slug_b":392,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":393},"core-i5-14600kf","core-ultra-5-250k-plus",44,{"slug_a":395,"slug_b":396,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":393},"core-ultra-5-225h","core-ultra-5-235h",{"slug_a":398,"slug_b":354,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":399},"core-i9-13900hx",43,{"slug_a":401,"slug_b":402,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":403},"core-i9-10980xe-extreme-edition","ryzen-9-pro-9965",42,{"slug_a":396,"slug_b":405,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":406},"core-ultra-5-235hx",41,{"slug_a":408,"slug_b":409,"name_a":9,"name_b":9,"i_heat":406},"core-ultra-7-265k","core-ultra-7-270k-plus"]